David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Noûs 40 (3):428-467 (2006)
Since the 1960's, work in the analytic tradition on the nature of mental and linguistic content has converged on the views that social facts about public language meaning are derived from facts about the thoughts of individuals, and that these thoughts are constituted by properties of the internal states of agents. I give a two-part argument against this picture of intentionality: first, that if mental content is prior to public language meaning, then a view of mental content much like the causal-pragmatic theory presented by Robert Stalnaker in Inquiry must be correct; second, that the causal-pragmatic theory is false. I conclude with some positive suggestions regarding alternative solutions to the `problem of intentionality.'.
|Keywords||Stalnaker intentionality indication mental content|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerry A. Fodor (1987). Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press.
Saul A. Kripke (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Gareth Evans (1982). Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
J. Adam Carter, Benjamin W. Jarvis & Katherine Rubin (2015). Varieties of Cognitive Achievement. Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1603-1623.
Robert D. Rupert (2008). Causal Theories of Mental Content. Philosophy Compass 3 (2):353–380.
Jason Stanley (2010). "Assertion" and Intentionality. Philosophical Studies 151 (1):87-113.
Jason Stanley (2010). “Assertion” and Intentionality. Philosophical Studies 151 (1):87-113.
Similar books and articles
Robert Stalnaker (1990). Narrow Content. In C. Anthony Anderson & Joseph Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: Csli
Jonathan Cohen (2002). Information and Content. In Luciano Floridi (ed.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Information and Computing. Blackwell
Benjamin Jarvis (2012). Norms of Intentionality: Norms That Don't Guide. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):1-25.
William P. Bechtel (1993). Decomposing Intentionality: Perspectives on Intentionality Drawn From Language Research with Two Species of Chimpanzees. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):1-32.
Brian Loar (2003). Phenomenal Intentionality as the Basis of Mental Content. In Martin Hahn & B. Ramberg (eds.), Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge. MIT Press 229--258.
Hartry Field (1986). Stalnaker on Intentionality: On Robert Stalnaker's Inquiry. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (April):98-112.
Robert Stalnaker (1986). Replies to Schiffer's "Stalnaker's Problem of Intentionality" and Field's "Stalnaker on Intentionality". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (April):113-123.
Richard E. Aquila (1989). Intentionality, Content, and Primitive Mental Directedness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (June):583-604.
Robert Stalnaker (1999). Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford University Press.
Robert Stalnaker (1990). Mental Content and Linguistic Form. Philosophical Studies 58 (1-2):129-46.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads123 ( #32,185 of 1,911,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #71,577 of 1,911,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?