Graduate studies at Western
In [Book Chapter] (in Press) (2000)
|Abstract||Humans are expert users of metarepresentations. How has this human metarepresentational capacity evolved? In order to contribute to the ongoing debate on this question, the chapter focuses on three more specific issues: i. How do humans metarepresent representations? ii. What came first: language, or metarepresentations? iii. Do humans have more than one metarepresentational ability?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Axel Gelfert (2011). Steps to an Ecology of Knowledge: Continuity and Change in the Genealogy of Knowledge. Episteme 8 (1):67-82.
Cristina Meini & Alberto Voltolini (2010). How Pretence Can Really Be Metarepresentational. Mind and Society 9 (1):31-58.
Joëlle Proust (2007). Metacognition and Metarepresentation: Is a Self-Directed Theory of Mind a Precondition for Metacognition? [REVIEW] Synthese 159 (2):271 - 295.
Daniel C. Dennett (2000). Making Tools for Thinking. In Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations. Oxford University Press.
W. Todd DeKay, Martie G. Haselton & Lee A. Kirkpatrick (2000). Reversing Figure and Ground in the Rationality Debate: An Evolutionary Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):670-671.
Robert A. Wilson (2000). The Mind Beyond Itself. In Dan Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press.
John Stewart (2001). Future Psychological Evolution. [Journal (on-Line/Unpaginated)].
Robert A. Wilson (2000). Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dan Sperber (ed.) (2000). Metarepresentations. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,333 of 739,790 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,790 )
How can I increase my downloads?