No Easy Argument for Two-Dimensionalism

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):775-781 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some opponents of epistemic two-dimensionalism say that the view should be rejected on the grounds that it misclassifies certain a posteriori claims as a priori. Elliott, McQueen, & Weber [2013] have argued that any argument of this form must fail. I argue that this conclusion is mistaken, and defend my argument [Speaks (2010] against their criticisms

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/00048402.2013.872689

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Epistemic two-dimensionalism and the epistemic argument.Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78.
Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Two-dimensionalism: A neo-Fregean interpretation.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2006 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Josep Macià (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Two-dimensionalism and Kripkean A Posteriori necessity.Kai-Yee Wong - 2006 - In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Josep Macià (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Two-dimensionalism and the “knowing which” requirement.Hagit Benbaji - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):55-67.
In defence of three-dimensionalism.Kit Fine - 2006 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:1-16.
Four-dimensionalism.Michael C. Rea - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-59.
A Two-Dimensionalist Guide to Conceptual Analysis.Jens Kipper - 2012 - Ontos.
Against vague existence.Theodore Sider - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):135 - 146.
From Four‐ to Five‐Dimensionalism.Andrew Graham - 2014 - Ratio 28 (1):14-28.
Four Dimensionalism.Theodore Sider - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Neo-Aristotelian Plenitude.Ross Inman - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):583-597.
Two-dimensional semantics and the nesting problem.David J. Chalmers & Brian Rabern - 2014 - Analysis 74 (2):210-224.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
145 (#124,435)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff Speaks
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Intensions and Indeterminacy: Reply to Soames, Turner, and Wilson.David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):249-269.
Unique Best Deserver Theory and Arguments From Misclassification.Richard Stillman - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):769-781.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Josep Macia (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford University Press. pp. 55-140.
Two-dimensional semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In E. Lepore & B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Epistemic two-dimensionalism and the epistemic argument.Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78.
Epistemic Two-Dimensionalism and the Epistemic Argument.Jeff Speaks - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59-78.

Add more references