Predictive Reaching for Occluded Objects by 6-Month-Old Infants
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Infants were presented with an object that moved into reaching space on a path that was either continuously visible or interrupted by an occluder. Infants’ reaching was reduced sharply when an occluder was present, even though the occluder itself was out of reach and did not serve as a barrier to direct reaching for the object. We account for these findings and for the apparently contrasting findings of experiments using preferential looking methods to assess infants’ object representations, by proposing that (a) object representations increase in precision over the infancy period, and (b) the precision of object representations varies in common ways at all ages as a function of object visibility and task demands.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kenny Boyce & Andrew Moon (forthcoming). In Defense of Proper Functionalism: Cognitive Science Takes on Swampman. Synthese:1-15.
Claes von Hofsten (2004). An Action Perspective on Motor Development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (6):266-272.
Kerstin Rosander & Claes von Hofsten (2004). Infants' Emerging Ability to Represent Occluded Object Motion. Cognition 91 (1):1-22.
Olga Kochukhova & Gustaf Gredebäck (2007). Learning About Occlusion: Initial Assumptions and Rapid Adjustments. Cognition 105 (1):26-46.
Susan Hespos, Gustaf Gredebäck, Claes Von Hofsten & Elizabeth S. Spelke (2009). Occlusion Is Hard: Comparing Predictive Reaching for Visible and Hidden Objects in Infants and Adults. Cognitive Science 33 (8):1483-1502.
Similar books and articles
Philip J. Kellman & Elizabeth S. Spelke (1983). Perception of Partly Occluded Objects in Infancy* 1. Cognitive Psychology 15 (4):483â524.
Elizabeth S. Spelke (1985). Object Permanence in Five-Month-Old Infants. Cognition 20 (3):191-208.
P. W. Jusczyk, S. P. Johnson, E. S. Spelke & L. J. Kennedy (1999). Synchronous Change and Perception of Object Unity: Evidence From Adults and Infants. Cognition 71 (3):257-88.
Emily Mather & Kim Plunkett (2012). The Role of Novelty in Early Word Learning. Cognitive Science 36 (7):1157-1177.
Paul Bloom (2002). Enumeration of Collective Entities by 5-Month-Old Infants. Cognition 83 (3):55-62.
In Kyeong Kim & Elizabeth S. Spelke, Infants' Sensitivity to Effects of Gravity on Visible Object Motion.
B. Elsner & G. Aschersleben (2003). Do I Get What You Get? Learning About the Effects of Self-Performed and Observed Actions in Infancy. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):732-751.
Elizabeth Spelke (2005). Chronometric Studies of Numerical Cognition in Five-Month-Old Infants. Cognition 97 (1):23-39.
Frank Keil (2008). Biases Towards Internal Features in Infants' Reasoning About Objects. Cognition 107 (2):420-432.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads21 ( #185,330 of 1,911,368 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #251,182 of 1,911,368 )
How can I increase my downloads?