David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 52 (1):143-158 (2013)
To be open-minded is to be willing to revise or entertain doubts about one’s beliefs. Commonly regarded as an intellectual virtue, and often too as a moral virtue, open-mindedness is a trait that is generally desirable for a person to have. However, in the major theistic traditions, absolute commitment to one’s religious beliefs is regarded as virtuous or ideal. But one cannot be completely resolved about an issue and at the same time be open to revising one’s beliefs about it. It appears, then, that religious devotion is inconsistent with open-mindedness. The more religiously devout a person is, the more firmly she will hold to her convictions. And the stronger her belief commitments, the less open-minded she will be regarding these beliefs. So there appears to be a paradox here, where from the standpoint of religious devotion, it is virtuous to display an intellectual vice, namely closed-mindedness. I discuss this problem and explore some potential routes of escape from the paradox
|Keywords||Open-minded Humility Virtue Devotion Descartes Kierkegaard|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Rene Descartes (2004). Meditations on First Philosophy. Caravan Books.
Michael Polanyi (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
William James (1991). The Varieties of Religious Experience. Triumph Books.
Michael Polanyi (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
Gabriele Taylor (1985). Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wayne Riggs (2010). Open-Mindedness. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):172-188.
William Hare (2003). Is It Good to Be Open-Minded? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):73-87.
Jason Baehr (2011). The Structure of Open-Mindedness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):191-213.
William Hare (2004). Open-Minded Inquiry. Inquiry 23 (3):37-41.
Connor Wood (2012). Review of Owen Flanagan, The Bodhisattva's Brain: Buddhism Naturalized. [REVIEW] Sophia 51 (2):327-329.
Robert McKim (2000). Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press.
BSc (2003). Open-Mindedness: A Virtue for Professional Practice. Nursing Philosophy 4 (1):17–24.
Derek Sellman (2003). Open-Mindedness: A Virtue for Professional Practice. Nursing Philosophy 4 (1):17-24.
Dwayne Raymond (2012). Comments on Justin Barrett's Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Sophia 51 (2):319-321.
William Hare & T. H. Mclaughlin (1994). Open-Mindedness, Commitment and Peter Gardner. Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):239–244.
Michael McKenna (2012). The Metaphysical Importance of the Compatibility Question: Comments on Mark Balaguer's Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem. Philosophical Studies (1):1-12.
Jason S. Baehr (2006). Character in Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 128 (3):479--514.
Shelley Wilcox (2012). Do Duties to Outsiders Entail Open Borders? A Reply to Wellman. Philosophical Studies (1):1-10.
Robert Kane (2012). Torn Decisions, Luck, and Libertarian Free Will: Comments on Balaguer's Free Will as an Open Scientific Problem. Philosophical Studies (1):1-8.
William Hare (1985). Open-Mindedness in the Classroom. Journal of Philosophy of Education 19 (2):251–259.
Added to index2012-04-07
Total downloads27 ( #156,630 of 1,938,529 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #159,600 of 1,938,529 )
How can I increase my downloads?