Bentham, Kant, and the right to communicate

Critical Review 15 (3-4):285-305 (2003)
Abstract Bentham favored a free press as an instrument of public control of the state, in the interest of the general happiness. Kant favored free public discussion as an instrument for the development and expression of autonomous rationality. But a free press embodied in the property rights of the owners of the press may well fail to achieve either Benthamite or Kantian goals. Such goals lead to a personal right to communicate rather than to a corporate right to press freedom.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913810308443584
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Hobbes (2007/2006). Leviathan. In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
J. R. Dinwiddy (1989/2004). Bentham. Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #291,913 of 1,725,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,420 of 1,725,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.