A utilitarian reply to dr. McCloskey
Inquiry 8 (1-4):264 – 291 (1965)
| Abstract | A theory of punishment should tell us not only when punishment is permissible but also when it is a duty. It is not clear whether McCloskey's retributivism is supposed to do this. His arguments against utilitarianism consist largely in examples of punishments unacceptable to the common moral consciousness but supposedly approved of by the consistent utilitarian. We remain unpersuaded to abandon our utilitarianism. The examples are often fanciful in character, a point which (pace McCloskey) does rob them of much of their force. If there was no tension between utilitarian precepts and those which come naturally to plain men, utilitarianism could have no claim to provide a critique of moralities. The utilitarian's attitude to such tensions is somewhat complicated, but what is certain is that there is more room in his system for the sentiments to which McCloskey appeals against him than McCloskey realizes. We agree with McCloskey, however, on the absurdity of substituting rule?utilitarianism for act?utilitarianism as an answer to his attacks. The distinction itself may represent a conceptual confusion. In our view, indeed, unmodified act?utilitarianism provides the best moral basis for thought about punishment | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. H. Monro (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II). Inquiry 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
Afschin Gandjour & Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach (2003). Utilitarian Theories Reconsidered: Common Misconceptions, More Recent Developments, and Health Policy Implications. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):229-244.
Daniel Hunter (1994). Act Utilitarianism and Dynamic Deliberation. Erkenntnis 41 (1):1 - 35.
Gerald Lang (2004). A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
H. J. McCloskey (1967). Utilitarian and Retributive Punishment. Journal of Philosophy 64 (3):91-110.
H. J. McCloskey (1963). A Note on Utilitarian Punishment. Mind 72 (288):599.
H. J. McCloskey (1965). A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment. Inquiry 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-04Total downloads42 ( #26,949 of 548,979 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,979 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
