Fetal protection: Law, ethics and corporate policy [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):731 - 735 (1992)
Corporate fetal protection policies are designed to protect unborn children from exposure to harmful substances in the workplace. In recent years, a number of corporations have instituted fetal protection policies which excluded all fertile female employees from jobs which exposed them to hazardous substances. Critics argued that these policies discriminated against women, and several lawsuits were filed.The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case involving the fetal protection policy of Johnson Controls, Inc. This article will analyze the impact of the Supreme Court decision from a legal and ethical perspective. Practical guidelines for policies which protect the unborn and comply with the law will also be addressed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Theodoros Papaioannou (2006). Towards a Critique of the Moral Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights. Journal of Global Ethics 2 (1):67 – 90.
Catherine E. Schwoerer, Douglas R. May & Benson Rosen (1995). Organizational Characteristics and HRM Policies on Rights: Exploring the Patterns of Connections. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (7):531 - 549.
David B. Resnik (2003). Strengthening the United States' Database Protection Laws: Balancing Public Access and Private Control. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):301-318.
LeRoy Walters (1974). Ethical Issues in Experimentation on the Human Fetus. Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (1):33 - 54.
I. Glenn Cohen & Sadath Sayeed (2011). Fetal Pain, Abortion, Viability, and the Constitution. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):235-242.
Eva E. Tsahuridu & Wim Vandekerckhove (2008). Organisational Whistleblowing Policies: Making Employees Responsible or Liable? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):107 - 118.
Mary Faith Marshall (1999). Commentary: Mal-Intentioned Illiteracy, Willful Ignorance, and Fetal Protection Laws: Is There a Lexicologist in the House? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):343-346.
Kenneth A. Ville & Loretta M. Kopelman (1999). Fetal Protection in Wisconsin's Revised Child Abuse Law: Right Goal, Wrong Remedy. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):332-342.
John F. Quinn (1988). Business Ethics, Fetal Protection Policies, and Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 7 (3/4):3-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #136,109 of 1,004,651 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,651 )
How can I increase my downloads?