David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 40 (1):3 – 22 (1997)
Spinoza distinguishes between three grades of knowledge, (i) sense perception and hearsay; (ii) abstract scientific knowledge; (iii) intuitive reason. It is implied that our intellectual ideal should be to pass from the first to the second, and then from the second to the third. It is problematic, however, how such supersession of the first kind of knowledge is an intelligible ideal. For, on the face of it, it is this alone which can direct our attention on to those particulars (single individuals) a better understanding of which is the main value of the second and third types of knowledge. But perhaps the third (if not, the second) kind of knowledge targets particulars from its own resources. However, it is doubtful that this is quite Spinoza's position. So there is something of a problem as to how he conceives the clearest knowledge of particulars which it makes sense to strive for. There is even a related problem as to how God can possess such knowledge, at least of particulars qua extended. An attempt is made to find a Spinozistic answer to these problems including a Spinozistic account of indexicals such as 'this'.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edmund Husserl & Fred Kersten (1982). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy First Book : General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology.
Benedictus de Spinoza & E. M. Curley (1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
C. de Deugd (1966). The Significance of Spinoza's First Kind of Knowledge. Assen, Van Gorcum.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
Harold Zellner (1985). Spinoza's Causal Likeness Principle. Philosophy Research Archives 11:453-462.
Peter Adamson (2005). On Knowledge of Particulars. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):273–294.
Carlos Fraenkel (2009). Maimonides and Spinoza as Sources for Maimon's Solution of the “Problem Quid Juris ” in Kant's Theory of Knowledge. Kant-Studien 100 (2):212-240.
Aaron Garrett (2012). Knowing the Essence of the State in Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):50-73.
G. H. R. Parkinson (1969). Language and Knowledge in Spinoza. Inquiry 12 (1-4):15 – 40.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Spinoza on the Politics of PhilosophicalUnderstanding Susan James and Eric Schliesser Angels and Philosophers: With a New Interpretation of Spinoza's Common Notions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):497-518.
Joseph Grange (1988). Spinoza's Scientia Intuitiva. Philosophy and Theology 2 (3):241-257.
Guttorm Fløistad (1969). Spinoza's Theory of Knowledge. Inquiry 12 (1-4):41 – 65.
Kevjn Lim (2009). God's Knowledge of Particulars. Journal of Islamic Philosophy 5:75-98.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads19 ( #190,009 of 1,792,900 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,728 of 1,792,900 )
How can I increase my downloads?