David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 20 (1-4):419 – 445 (1977)
Of the two main interpretations of Spinoza's theory of the identity of the attributes, in particular those of Thought and Extension, the objective interpretation is now almost universally preferred to the subjective. Rejection of the subjective interpretation, according to which the attributes are merely our ways of cognizing a reality whose real essence remains unknown, is certainly justified, but the objective theory comes too near to replacing the identity by a mere correlation of diff rents to be quite satisfactory. Is it not better to say that Thought and Extension represent two complementary conceptions of reality which are both correct? Yes, but in saying so some commentators ascribe to mind, as Spinoza conceives it, an unplausibly abstract status. An alternative proposal is made as to a way in which Spinoza might be right in essentials, though it requires that a certain tension in Spinozism as to the nature of body be resolved in a particular direction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
E. M. Curley (1969). Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Harry Austryn Wolfson (1934/1983). The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning. Harvard University Press.
Martial Guéroult (1968). Spinoza. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
José-Luis Diaz (2000). Mind-Body Unity, Dual Aspect, and the Emergence of Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):393 – 403.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1984). Non-Human Rights: An Idealist Perspective. Inquiry 27 (1-4):439 – 461.
Similar books and articles
Steven Nadler (2008). Spinoza and Consciousness. Mind 117 (467):575-601.
F. Scott Scribner (2002). Extending Spinoza… For the Love of God! International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (2):151-160.
Paul Wienpahl (1971). Ch'an Buddhism, Western Thought, and the Concept of Substance. Inquiry 14 (1-4):84 – 101.
Noa Shein (2009). The False Dichotomy Between Objective and Subjective Interpretations of Spinoza's Theory of Attributes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):505 – 532.
Jonathan Bennett (1965). A Note on Descartes and Spinoza. Philosophical Review 74 (3):379-380.
Andreas Schmidt (2009). Substance Monism and Identity Theory in Spinoza. In Olli Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics. Cambridge University Press
Pierfrancesco Basile (2012). Russell on Spinoza's Substance Monism. Metaphysica 13 (1):27-41.
Ruth L. Saw (1969). Personal Identity in Spinoza. Inquiry 12 (1-4):1 – 14.
Charles E. Jarrett (1977). Some Remarks on the 'Objective' and 'Subjective' Interpretations of the Attributes. Inquiry 20 (1-4):447 – 456.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads35 ( #93,308 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?