David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 21 (3-4):155- (1927)
August Wilhelm von Schlegel, who did so much to rend the already torn artistic reputation of Euripides in the early nineteenth century, is singularly lenient in his criticism of the Hecuba. His adverse comment is limited to three points only: The first, that ‘the two actions of this piece—the sacrifice of Polyxena and the revenge on Polymestor on account of the murder of Polydorus—have nothing in common with each other but their connexion with Hecuba’; the second, that ‘the second half destroys the soft impressions of the first in a highly repulsive manner’; and the third, that it is ‘not very suitable that Hecuba should display such presence of mind in her revenge.’ In this leniency he differs from one of the latest modern English critics, Professor G. Norwood,2 who does not hesitate to condemn the play as ‘on the whole poor and uninteresting,’ ‘far below the best of Euripides' work’; and from his great predecessor, J. J. Reiske, who condemned the play on ten distinct counts, all different from those that form the basis of SchlegeFs own argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Henry B. Veatch (1970). Language and Ethics: "What's Hecuba to Him, or He to Hecuba?". Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 44:45 - 62.
E. B. England (1895). Hadley's Edition of the Hecuba The Hecuba of Euripides, with Introduction and Notes, by W. S. Hadley, M.A. Cambridge, University Press. 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (03):170-172.
S. Ireland (1988). Euripides' Hippolytus and Hecuba David Kovacs: The Heroic Muse: Studies in the Hippolytus and Hecuba of Euripides. (AJP Monographs in Classical Philology, 2.) Pp. Xiv+161. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. $19.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (02):208-209.
E. C. Marchant (1901). Euripides, Hecuba, Ll. 1214–5. The Classical Review 15 (08):429-.
A. W. Mair (1901). On Euripides, Hecuba, Ll. 1214–15. The Classical Review 15 (07):375-376.
E. C. Marchant (1901). Note on Euripides, Hecuba, Ll. 1214–15. The Classical Review 15 (06):295-.
Martin Korenjak (1997). A Note on Euripides, Hecuba 1054F. Classical Quarterly 47 (02):569-.
B. Goward (1998). Wild Justice: A Study of Euripides' Hecuba. J Mossman. The Classical Review 48 (2):272-273.
Nicholas Lane (2007). Staging Polydorus' Ghost in the Prologue of Euripides' Hecuba. Classical Quarterly 57 (01):290-.
Artheur W. H. Adkins (1966). Basic Greek Values in Euripides' Hecuba and Hercules Furens. Classical Quarterly 16 (02):193-.
Ra’Anana Meridor (2000). Creative Rhetoric in Euripides' Troades: Some Notes on Hecuba's Speech. Classical Quarterly 50 (01):16-.
Karin Melis (2005). Reading Medea Nad Hecuba: The Tragic in Unconditional Love. Dialogue and Universalism 15 (1-2):203-210.
D. Bain (1997). Review. Euripides: Children of Heracles, Hippolytus, Andromache, Hecuba. D Kovacs. The Classical Review 47 (1):18-20.
James Diggle (1977). The Manuscripts of Hecuba Kjeld Matthiessen: Studien Zur Textüberlieferung der Hekabe des Euripides. Pp. 147; 8 Plates. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1974. Cloth. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (01):6-7.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads2 ( #404,475 of 1,679,359 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?