David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297 (2001)
The question of whether, and to what extent, business managers have obligations to stakeholders has been the principal theme in much of recent business ethics literature. The question of whether shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, however, has not been addressed sufficiently. I provide some needed attention to this matter by examining the positions of shareholders in the contemporary world of investing. Their positions are considerably different than that often envisioned by business ethicists and economists where shareholders determine the directions of corporate activities through their voting decisions. Typical contemporary investors rarely control corporate activities. If they own corporate securities directly, generally they own too small an interest to exercise control. And, in most cases, they do not even own corporate securities directly, but, rather, own shares in funds. Because of the positions of shareholders today, it is highly questionable whether most have obligations to stakeholders. This has a significant implication for business managers. Whether or not shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, business managers have a greater obligation to educate shareholders about how corporate activities affect stakeholders. I provide a justification for that obligation and comment on how business managers might begin to fulfill it.
|Keywords||business managers contemporary investing corporate securities culpable ignorance direct model fairness free-riding obligations shareholders stakeholders|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martin E. Sandbu (2012). Stakeholder Duties: On the Moral Responsibility of Corporate Investors. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):97-107.
Similar books and articles
Mohammed Omran, Peter Atrill & John Pointon (2002). Shareholders Versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns. Business Ethics 11 (4):318–326.
Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Cynthia Clark Williams & Lori Verstegen Ryan (2007). Courting Shareholders: The Ethical Implications of Altering Corporate Ownership Structures. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):669-688.
Shawn D. Howton, Shelly W. Howton & Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Douglas A. Houston & John S. Howe (1987). The Ethics of Going Private. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):519 - 525.
Cengiz Haksever, Radha Chaganti & Ronald G. Cook (2004). A Model of Value Creation: Strategic View. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):295-307.
Alejandro Hazera (1995). A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Corporate Financial Accountability and its Impact on the Responsibilities of Corporate Managers. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):479-497.
Joseph Heath (2006). Business Ethics Without Stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):533-558.
Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie (1994). Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
William Irvine (1988). Corporate Democracy and the Rights of Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):99 - 108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #148,703 of 1,102,964 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,029 of 1,102,964 )
How can I increase my downloads?