Do shareholders have obligations to stakeholders?
Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297 (2001)
| Abstract | The question of whether, and to what extent, business managers have obligations to stakeholders has been the principal theme in much of recent business ethics literature. The question of whether shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, however, has not been addressed sufficiently. I provide some needed attention to this matter by examining the positions of shareholders in the contemporary world of investing. Their positions are considerably different than that often envisioned by business ethicists and economists where shareholders determine the directions of corporate activities through their voting decisions. Typical contemporary investors rarely control corporate activities. If they own corporate securities directly, generally they own too small an interest to exercise control. And, in most cases, they do not even own corporate securities directly, but, rather, own shares in funds. Because of the positions of shareholders today, it is highly questionable whether most have obligations to stakeholders. This has a significant implication for business managers. Whether or not shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, business managers have a greater obligation to educate shareholders about how corporate activities affect stakeholders. I provide a justification for that obligation and comment on how business managers might begin to fulfill it. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMohammed Omran, Peter Atrill & John Pointon (2002). Shareholders Versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns. Business Ethics 11 (4):318–326.
Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie (1994). Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
Joseph Heath (2006). Business Ethics Without Stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):533-558.
Alejandro Hazera (1995). A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Corporate Financial Accountability and its Impact on the Responsibilities of Corporate Managers. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):479-497.
Cengiz Haksever, Radha Chaganti & Ronald G. Cook (2004). A Model of Value Creation: Strategic View. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):295-307.
Douglas A. Houston & John S. Howe (1987). The Ethics of Going Private. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):519 - 525.
Shawn D. Howton, Shelly W. Howton & Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Cynthia Clark Williams & Lori Verstegen Ryan (2007). Courting Shareholders: The Ethical Implications of Altering Corporate Ownership Structures. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):669-688.
Victoria B. McWilliams (2008). The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
William Irvine (1988). Corporate Democracy and the Rights of Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):99 - 108.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,239 of 549,010 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
