What physical properties are

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):201-225 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper concerns the question of how to specify what is to count as physical for the purposes of debates concerning either physicalism or the completeness of physics. I argue that what is needed from an account of the physical depends primarily on the particular issue at stake, and that the demand for a general a priori specification of the physical is misplaced. A number of attempts to say what should be counted as physical are defended from recent attacks by Chris Daly, and a specific proposal due to David Papineau developed and extended. I argue that this approach is more than suitable for the debates for which it is intended.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
287 (#67,942)

6 months
72 (#60,174)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Spurrett
University of KwaZulu-Natal

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Language and Mind.Noam Chomsky - 1968 - Cambridge University Press.
Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 32 references / Add more references