What's Wrong with Computer-Generated Images of Perfection in Advertising?
Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):257 - 268 (2003)
| Abstract | Advertisers often use computers to create fantastic images. Generally, these are perfectly harmless images that are used for comic or dramatic effect. Sometimes, however, they are problematic human images that I call computer-generated images of perfection. Advertisers create these images by using computer technology to remove unwanted traits from models or to generate entire human bodies. They are images that portray ideal human beauty, bodies, or looks. In this paper, I argue that the use of such images is unethical. I begin by explaining the common objections against advertising and by demonstrating how critics might argue that those objections apply to computer-generated images of perfection. Along the way, I demonstrate an ethically significant difference between computer-generated images of perfection and the images in ordinary ads. I argue that although critics might use this fact to apply the common objections to the use of computer-generated images of perfection, the objections fail. Finally, I argue that despite surviving the common objections, the use of computer-generated images of perfection is subject to an ethical objection that is based on aesthetic considerations. Advertisers are ethically obligated to avoid certain aesthetic results that are produced by computer-generated images of perfection. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMegan Delehanty (2010). Why Images? Medicine Studies 2 (3):161-173.
Jörg R. J. Schirra (2005). Foundation of Computational Visualistics. Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Michael K. Green (1993). Images of Native Americans in Advertising: Some Moral Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):323 - 330.
Susan Keith, Carol B. Schwalbe & B. William Silcock (2006). Images in Ethics Codes in an Era of Violence and Tragedy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (4):245 – 264.
Paul Lauritzen (2008). Visual Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):50 – 56.
David Hodgson (2012). Identifying and Reconciling Two Images of “Man”. Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
James A. Marcum (2009). Human Origins and Human Nature. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):566-570.
Zhaohui Bao (2010). The Advantages, Shortcomings, and Existential Issues of Zhuangzi's Use of Images. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):196-211.
Roger Strand (2009). How to Understand Nano Images. Techné 13 (3):182-189.
Vincent Bontems (2011). How to Accommodate to the Invisible? The 'Halo' of 'Nano'. Nanoethics 5 (2):175-183.
Hilde Corneliussen (2011). Gender-Technology Relations: Exploring Stability and Change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eyal Sagi, Dedre Gentner & Andrew Lovett (2012). What Difference Reveals About Similarity. Cognitive Science 36 (6):1019-1050.
Alejandro A. Vallega (2011). Displacements—Beyond the Coloniality of Images. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):206-227.
Robert N. Audi (1978). The Ontological Status of Mental Images. Inquiry 21 (1-4):348-61.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-29Total downloads16 ( #74,564 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
