Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):718-723 (2006)
Background: Authors are required to describe in their manuscripts ethical approval from an appropriate committee and how consent was obtained from participants when research involves human participants.Objective: To assess the reporting of these protections for several study designs in general medical journals.Design: A consecutive series of research papers published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine between February and May 2003 were reviewed for the reporting of ethical approval and patient consent. Ethical approval, name of approving committee, type of consent, data source and whether the study used data collected as part of a study reported elsewhere were recorded. Differences in failure to report approval and consent by study design, journal and vulnerable study population were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.Results: Ethical approval and consent were not mentioned in 31% and 47% of manuscripts, respectively. 88 papers failed to report both approval and consent. Failure to mention ethical approval or consent was significantly more likely in all study designs than in randomised controlled trials . Failure to mention approval was most common in the BMJ and was significantly more likely than in The New England Journal of Medicine. Failure to mention consent was most common in the BMJ and was significantly more likely than in all other journals. No significant differences in approval or consent were found when comparing studies of vulnerable and non-vulnerable participants.Conclusion: The reporting of ethical approval and consent in RCTs has improved, but journals are less good at reporting this information for other study designs. Journals should publish this information for all research on human participants
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jérémy Vanhelst, Ludovic Hardy, Dina Bert, Stéphane Duhem, Stéphanie Coopman, Christian Libersa, Dominique Deplanque, Frédéric Gottrand & Laurent Béghin (2013). Effect of Child Health Status on Parents' Allowing Children to Participate in Pediatric Research. BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):7.
Nchangwi S. Munung, Godfrey B. Tangwa, Chi P. Che, Laurent Vidal & Odile Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer (2012). Are Students Kidding with Health Research Ethics? The Case of HIV/AIDS Research in Cameroon. BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):12.
Similar books and articles
J. F. Meschia (2003). Reporting of Informed Consent and Ethics Committee Approval in Genetics Studies of Stroke. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):371-a-372.
Anne Rowan-Legg, Charles Weijer, J. Gao & C. Fernandez (2009). A Comparison of Journal Instructions Regarding Institutional Review Board Approval and Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Between 1995 and 2005. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):74-78.
Evelyne Decullier, Véronique Lhéritier & François Chapuis (2005). The Activity of French Research Ethics Committees and Characteristics of Biomedical Research Protocols Involving Humans: A Retrospective Cohort Study. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10.
K. A. Finlay & C. V. Fernandez (2008). Failure to Report and Provide Commentary on Research Ethics Board Approval and Informed Consent in Medical Journals. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):761-764.
Robert L. Klitzman, Kelly Kleinert, Hoda Rifai-Bashjawish & L. E. U. Shiung (2011). The Reporting of Irb Review in Journal Articles Presenting Hiv Research Conducted in the Developing World. Developing World Bioethics 11 (3):161-169.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
A. McRae, M. Taljaard, C. Weijer, C. Bennett, Z. Skea, R. Boruch, J. Brehaut, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw & A. Donner (2013). Reporting of Patient Consent in Healthcare Cluster Randomised Trials is Associated with the Type of Study Interventions and Publication Characteristics. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):119-124.
Ben Almassi (2014). Medical Ghostwriting and Informed Consent. Bioethics 28 (9):491-499.
Athula Sumathipala, Sisira Siribaddana, Suwin Hewege, Manura Lekamwattage, Manjula Athukorale, Chesmal Siriwardhana, Joanna Murray & Martin Prince (2008). Ethics Review Committee Approval and Informed Consent: An Analysis of Biomedical Publications Originating From Sri Lanka. BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):3-.
Peter Williams & Elizabeth Wager (2013). Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11.
Margaret Brazier & Mary Lobjoit (eds.) (1991). Protecting the Vulnerable: Autonomy and Consent in Health Care. Routledge.
M. R. Robling (2004). Public Attitudes Towards the Use of Primary Care Patient Record Data in Medical Research Without Consent: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):104-109.
Tom Walker (2013). Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information. Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
Jukka Varelius (2010). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Jerome Bickenbach (2012). Argumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor–Patient Relationship. Journal of Argumentaion in Context 1 (1):5-18.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?