Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):533-537 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By using tissue typing in conjunction with preimplantation genetic diagnosis doctors are able to pick a human embryo for implantation which, if all goes well, will become a “saviour sibling”, a brother or sister capable of donating life-saving tissue to an existing child.This paper addresses the question of whether this form of selection should be banned and concludes that it should not. Three main prohibitionist arguments are considered and found wanting: the claim that saviour siblings would be treated as commodities; a slippery slope argument, which suggests that this practice will lead to the creation of so-called “designer babies”; and a child welfare argument, according to which saviour siblings will be physically and/or psychologically harmed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saviour siblings.M. Spriggs - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):289-289.
Selecting Barrenness - A response from Tom Shakespeare.Tom Shakespeare - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):22-24.
Selecting Barrenness - A Response from Donna Dickenson.Donna Dickenson - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):25-28.
Selecting Barrenness - A response from Anne Williams.Anne Williams - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):29-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
153 (#120,620)

6 months
22 (#119,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?