Artworks Are Not Valuable for Their Own Sake

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy of Art  Value of Art  Intrinsic value
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Nicholas Stang, Artworks Are Not Valuable for Their Own Sake
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Dominic McIver Lopes (2007). Art Without ‘Art’. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):1-15.
Gwen Bradford (2013). The Value of Achievements. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):204-224.
Peter Goldie (2007). Towards a Virtue Theory of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):372-387.
Casey Haskins (1990). Kant, Autonomy, and Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (3):235-237.
Donald B. Kuspit (1968). Dewey's Critique of Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):93-98.
Richard Shusterman (1984). Aesthetic Censorship: Censoring Art for Art's Sake. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (2):171-180.
Van Meter Ames (1975). Art for Art's Sake Again? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):303 - 307.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-03-01

Total downloads

107 ( #9,661 of 1,100,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #11,146 of 1,100,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.