David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (1):69-89 (2012)
A distinctive theory of punishment plays a central role in Smith's moral and legal theory. According to this theory, we regard the punishment of a crime as deserved only to the extent that an impartial spectator would go along with the actual or supposed resentment of the victim. The first part of this paper argues that Smith's theory deserves serious consideration and relates it to other theories such as utilitarianism and more orthodox forms of retributivism. The second part considers the objection that, because Smith's theory implies that punishment is justified only when there is some person or persons who is the victim of the crime, it cannot explain the many cases where punishment is imposed purely for the public good. It is argued that Smith's theory could be extended to cover such cases. The third part defends Smith's theory against the objection that, because it relies on our natural feelings, it cannot provide an adequate moral justification of punishment.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Nozick (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press.
Adam Smith (1790). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Dover Publications.
Richard Price (2007). A Review of the Principal Questions in Morals. [REVIEW] In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 733-734.
Paul Russell (1995). Freedom and Moral Sentiment: Hume's Way of Naturalizing Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Michael Cholbi (2010). Compulsory Victim Restitution is Punishment: A Reply to Boonin. Public Reason 2 (1):85-93.
Jami L. Anderson (1999). A Hegelian Theory of Punishment. Legal Theory 5 (4):363-388.
J. Angelo Corlett (1993). Foundations of a Kantian Theory of Punishment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):263-283.
Thom Brooks (2003). Kant's Theory of Punishment. Utilitas 15 (2):206.
Adam Kolber (2012). Unintentional Punishment. Legal Theory 18 (1):1-29.
Jami L. Anderson (1999). Annulment Retributivism: A Hegelian Theory of Punishment. Cambridge University Press 5 (4):363-388.
Michael Davis (2010). What Punishment for the Murder of 10,000? Res Publica 16 (2):101-118.
Robert Fudge (2009). Sympathy, Beauty, and Sentiment: Adam Smith's Aesthetic Morality. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (2):133-146.
Thom Brooks (2012). Punishment. Routledge.
Christopher Bennett (2006). State Denunciation of Crime. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):288-304.
Matt Matravers (2000). Justice and Punishment: The Rationale of Coercion. Oxford University Press.
Shawn J. Bayern, The Significance of Private Burdens and Lost Benefits for a Fair-Play Analysis of Punishment.
Suzanne Uniacke (2015). Punishment as Penalty. Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (1):37-47.
Added to index2012-03-01
Total downloads26 ( #182,983 of 1,941,042 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,940 of 1,941,042 )
How can I increase my downloads?