Balance in psychological research: The dual process perspective
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):357-358 (2004)
| Abstract | Krueger & Funder (K&F) are right that various imbalances characterize social psychology, but I question whether they are characteristic of psychology or cognitive science as a whole. Dual-process theories, popular in the latter fields, emphasize both processing biases and the adaptiveness of human cognition in a more balanced manner. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jillian Craigie (2011). Thinking and Feeling: Moral Deliberation in a Dual-Process Framework. Philosophical Psychology 24 (1):53-71.
Brian Fiala, Adam Arico & Shaun Nichols (2011). On the Psychological Origins of Dualism: Dual-Process Cognition and the Explanatory Gap. In Edward Slingerland & Mark Collard (eds.), Creating Consilience: Issues and Case Studies in teh Integration of the Sciences and Humanities. OUP.
Keith Frankish (2010). Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):914-926.
James Friedrich (2000). Fleshing Out a Dual-System Solution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):671-672.
J. Evans & K. Frankish (eds.) (2008). In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
Linda A. W. Brakel & Howard Shevrin (2003). Freud's Dual Process Theory and the Place of the a-Rational. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):527-528.
Jacqueline N. Wood (2004). Social Cognitive Neuroscience: The Perspective Shift in Progress. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):360-361.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #94,544 of 556,815 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,815 )How can I increase my downloads? |

