Benefit versus numbers versus helping the worst-off: An alternative to the prevalent approach to the just distribution of resources
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 20 (3):356-382 (2008)
A central strand in philosophical debate over the just distribution of resources attempts to juggle three competing imperatives: helping those who are worst off, helping those who will benefit the most, and then determining when to aggregate such and claims, and when instead to treat no such claim as greater than that which any individual by herself can exert. Yet as various philosophers have observed, as to how to weigh each of the three imperatives against one another, we find it , and we do not yet have a . In what follows, I offer an approach to weighing the three criteria against one another that yields resolutions saving one infant's life versus replacing ten elderly people's hips that are cardinally definitive, intuitively satisfactory and theoretically justified
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Re'em Segev (2010). Hierarchical Consequentialism. Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
Karl Widerquist (2010). How the Sufficiency Minimum Becomes a Social Maximum. Utilitas 22 (4):474-480.
Similar books and articles
Nathan Salmon (2008). Numbers Versus Nominalists. Analysis 68 (299):177–182.
Kurt Stocker (2012). The Time Machine in Our Mind. Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Gang Ke (1990). A Comparative Study of the Representational Paradigms Between Liberalism and Socialism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):5-34.
Stephanie L. Brown & R. Michael Brown (2005). Social Bonds, Motivational Conflict, and Altruism: Implications for Neurobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):351-352.
Sharon Hays (1994). Structure and Agency and the Sticky Problem of Culture. Sociological Theory 12 (1):57-72.
Peter Vallentyne (2000). Equality, Efficiency, and the Priority of the Worse-Off. Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):1-19.
William Bechtel (1998). Dynamicists Versus Computationalists: Whither Mechanists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):629-629.
Karl Halvor Teigen (2000). Intuitive Versus Analytic Abilities: The Case of Words Versus Numbers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):698-699.
Daniel M. Hausman (2015). Equality Versus Priority: A Misleading Distinction. Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #136,893 of 1,907,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #42,510 of 1,907,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?