David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Analysis 63 (4):269–281 (2003)
According to what I will call a contextualist solution to the sorites paradox, vague terms are context-sensitive, and one can give a convincing dissolution of the sorites paradox in terms of this context-dependency. The reason, according to the contextualist, that precise boundaries for expressions like “heap” or “tall for a basketball player” are so difficult to detect is that when two entities are sufficiently similar (or saliently similar), we tend to shift the interpretation of the vague expression so that if one counts as falling in the extension of the property expressed by that expression, so does the other. As a consequence, when we look for the boundary of the extension of a vague expression in its penumbra, our very looking has the effect of changing the interpretation of the vague expression so that the boundary is not where we are looking. This accounts for the persuasive force of sorites arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jason Stanley (2000). Context and Logical Form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
Scott Soames (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford University Press.
Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó (2000). On Quantifier Domain Restriction. Mind and Language 15 (2&3):219--61.
Jason C. Stanley (2002). Nominal Restriction. In Georg Peter & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford University Press 365--390.
Diana Raffman (1994). Vagueness Without Paradox. Philosophical Review 103 (1):41-74.
Citations of this work BETA
John MacFarlane (2009). Nonindexical Contextualism. Synthese 166 (2):231--250.
Christopher Kennedy (2007). Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1):1 - 45.
Donnchadh O'Conaill & Tuomas E. Tahko (2016). Minimal Truthmakers. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):228-244.
Sam Alxatib & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (2011). The Psychology of Vagueness: Borderline Cases and Contradictions. Mind and Language 26 (3):287-326.
Similar books and articles
Delia Graff Fara (2003). Gap Principles, Penumbral Consequence, and Infinitely Higher-Order Vagueness. In J. C. Beall (ed.), New Essays on the Semantics of Paradox. Oxford University Press
Ofra Magidor (2012). Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Anthony Everett (1996). Qualia and Vagueness. Synthese 106 (2):205-226.
Joshua Gert (2008). Vague Terms, Indexicals, and Vague Indexicals. Philosophical Studies 140 (3):437 - 445.
Elia Zardini (2013). Higher-Order Sorites Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.
Mark Colyvan (2010). A Topological Sorites. Journal of Philosophy 107 (6):311-325.
Rosanna Keefe (2007). Vagueness Without Context Change. Mind 116 (462):275-292.
Jonathan Ellis (2004). Context, Indexicals and the Sorites. Analysis 64 (4):362–364.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads163 ( #22,229 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)35 ( #22,726 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?