David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theory and Decision 46 (2):139-157 (1999)
This paper tests a novel implication of the original version of prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979): that choices may systematically violate transitivity. Some have interpreted this implication as a weakness, viewing it as an anomaly generated by the âediting phaseâ of prospect theory which can be rendered redundant by an appropriate re-specification of the preference function. Although there is some existing evidence that transitivity fails descriptively, the particular form of non-transitivity implied by prospect theory is quite distinctive and hence presents an ideal opportunity to expose that theory to test. An experiment is reported which reveals strong evidence of the predicted intransitivity. It is argued that the existence of this new form of non-transitive behaviour presents a fresh theoretical challenge to those seeking descriptively adequate theories of choice behaviour, and a particular challenge to those who seek explanations within the conventional economic paradigm of utility maximisation
|Keywords||Intransitivity Experimental economics Prospect theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael H. Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt (2010). Testing Transitivity in Choice Under Risk. Theory and Decision 69 (4):599-614.
Similar books and articles
Oscar Horta (2011). Betterness, Spectrum Cases and the Challenge to Transitivity in Axiology. Diacritica 25:125-137.
Per Norström (2011). Technological Know-How From Rules of Thumb. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (2):96-109.
Rolf Aaberge (2011). Empirical Rules of Thumb for Choice Under Uncertainty. Theory and Decision 71 (3):431-438.
Timothy McGrew & Lydia McGrew (2000). Foundationalism, Transitivity and Confirmation. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:47-66.
Allan Franklin (2002). Fisica y Experimentacion. Theoria 17 (2):221-242.
Robin Cubitt (2005). Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):197-210.
Tomoji Shogenji (2003). A Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):613-616.
Charlie Pelling (2007). Conceptualism and the (Supposed) Non-Transitivity of Colour Indiscriminability. Philosophical Studies 134 (2):211 - 234.
David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg (2013). Transitivity and Partial Screening Off. Theoria 79 (4):294-308.
Dr David Guez (2010). From Cognition to Consciousness: A Discussion About Learning, Reality Representation and Decision Making. Biological Theory 5 (2):136-141.
Enrica Carbone & John D. Hey (2001). A Test of the Principle of Optimality. Theory and Decision 50 (3):263-281.
Delia Graff Fara (2001). Phenomenal Continua and the Sorites. Mind 110 (440):905-935.
John Post & Derek Turner (2000). Sic Transitivity. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:67-82.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads10 ( #165,277 of 1,410,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,589 of 1,410,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?