Cycling with Rules of Thumb: An Experimental Test for a new form of Non-Transitive Behaviour

Theory and Decision 46 (2):139-157 (1999)
Abstract
This paper tests a novel implication of the original version of prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979): that choices may systematically violate transitivity. Some have interpreted this implication as a weakness, viewing it as an anomaly generated by the ‘editing phase’ of prospect theory which can be rendered redundant by an appropriate re-specification of the preference function. Although there is some existing evidence that transitivity fails descriptively, the particular form of non-transitivity implied by prospect theory is quite distinctive and hence presents an ideal opportunity to expose that theory to test. An experiment is reported which reveals strong evidence of the predicted intransitivity. It is argued that the existence of this new form of non-transitive behaviour presents a fresh theoretical challenge to those seeking descriptively adequate theories of choice behaviour, and a particular challenge to those who seek explanations within the conventional economic paradigm of utility maximisation
Keywords Intransitivity  Experimental economics  Prospect theory
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    Per Norström (2011). Technological Know-How From Rules of Thumb. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 15 (2):96-109.
    Robin Cubitt (2005). Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):197-210.
    Tomoji Shogenji (2003). A Condition for Transitivity in Probabilistic Support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (4):613-616.
    John Post & Derek Turner (2000). Sic Transitivity. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:67-82.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-02

    Total downloads

    5 ( #178,779 of 1,088,790 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,790 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.