Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116 (1997)
|Abstract||A quid pro quo is an exchange of value between a citizen or group—often a businessperson or organization—and an official; whatthe citizen or group offers can take either monetary or nonmonetary form and what the official supplies, in return, is some kind of public act. Despite the fact that instances of quid pro quo seem continually to compel public attention, very few rise to the level of bribery; i.e., the level in which they are resolved judicially. In part, quid pro quo eludes judicial forums for factual reasons: It is difficult to prove. And in part, the reasons are normative: The distinction between objectionable quid pro quo and acceptable democratic norms—on which citizens and groups ought to be able to support officials who are in turn responsive to them—is difficult to draw. Hence, a great gray area of quid pro quo finds itself resolved (or at least debated) in political forums. In what follows I examine central strands of American public discourse over the factual and normative issues of quid pro quo. My purpose is to articulate those principles which most parsimoniously account for its structure, and to explore what presuppositions various discourse-participants either explicitly or implicitly bring to bear in determining whether a situation constitutes a troubling quid pro quo|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jerome P. Kassirer (2007). Professional Societies and Industry Support: What Is the Quid Pro Quo? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50 (1):7-17.
Roger French (1993). The History of Medicines J. M. Riddle: Quid Pro Quo: Studies in the History of Drugs. (Variorum Collected Studies Series, 367.) Pp. Xi + 341; 2 Illustrations. Brookfield, VT and Aldershot: Variorum, 1992. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):409-410.
Lloyd Newton (2004). Duns Scotus's Account of a Propter Quid Science of the Categories. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:145-160.
Brian B. Stanko & Mark Schneider (1999). Sexual Harassment in the Public Accounting Profession? Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):185 - 200.
Kevin L. Stoker & Kati A. Tusinski (2006). Reconsidering Public Relations' Infatuation with Dialogue: Why Engagement and Reconciliation Can Be More Ethical Than Symmetry and Reciprocity. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (2 & 3):156 – 176.
Timothy Dolan (2010). Quo OHRP?: Faithful Arbiter or Pro Wrestling Ref? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):53-55.
Lawrence M. Hinman (1980). Quid Facti or Quid Juris? The Fundamental Ambiguity of Gadamer's Understanding of Hermeneutics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (4):512-535.
G. B. A. Fletcher (1932). More Loeb Cicero Cicero: Pro Milone, In Pisonem, Pro Scauro, Pro Fonteio, Pro Rabirio Postumo, Pro Marcello, Pro Ligario, Pro Deioiaro. With an English Translation by N. H. Watts. Pp. Viii + 547. (Loeb Classical Library.) London: Heinemann, 1931. Cloth, 10s. Net; Leather, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (03):129-130.
E. Harrison (1910). M. Tulli Ciceronis Ovationes Pro P. Quinctio, Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo, Pro A. Caecina, de Lege Agraria Contra Rullum, Pro C. Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, Pro L. Flacco, in L. Pisonem, Pro C. Rabirio Postumo, Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit Albertus Curtis Clark. Oxonii, E Typographeo Clarendoniano. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (08):260-.
Percy Black (1993). Extraneous Intrusions in Moral Temptation Can Switch Decisions. Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):139-156.
Dale Dorsey (2010). Preferences, Welfare, and the Status-Quo Bias. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):535-554.
Steve Viner (2010). Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.
J. E. Sandys (1906). Clark's Orations of Cicero (1) The Vetus Cluniacensis of Cicero, Being a Contribution to the Textual Criticism of Cicero Pro Sex. Roscio, Pro Cluentio, Pro Murena, Pro Caelio, and Pro Milone. By Albert C. Clark, M.A., Fellow of Queen's College, Oxford. With Two Facsimiles. Pp. Lxix + 57. 4to. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1905. 8s. 6d. (2) M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes Pro Sex. Roscio, de Imperio Cn. Pompei, Pro Cluentio, in Catilinam, Pro Murena, Pro Caelio, Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit Albertus Curtis Clark. Oxonii: E Typographeo Clarendoniano. Pp. Xiv + Circa 352. Date of Preface Sept. 1905. 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (01):65-67.
A. S. Wilkins (1902). Clark's Orations of Cicero M. Tulli Ciceronis Orationes. Vol. Vi.: Pro Milone, Pro Marcello, Pro Ligario, Pro Rege Deiotaro, Philippicae I—XIV. Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit Albertus Curtis Clark. Oxonii. E Typographeo Clarendoniano. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (08):416-417.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?