David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):153–168 (2002)
[Philip Percival] I aim to illuminate foundational epistemological issues by reflecting on 'epistemic consequentialism'-the epistemic analogue of ethical consequentialism. Epistemic consequentialism employs a concept of cognitive value playing a role in epistemic norms governing belief-like states that is analogous to the role goodness plays in act-governing moral norms. A distinction between 'direct' and 'indirect' versions of epistemic consequentialism is held to be as important as the familiar ethical distinction on which it is based. These versions are illustrated, respectively, by cognitive decision-theory and reliabilism. Cognitive decision-theory is defended, and various conceptual issues concerning it explored. A simple dilemma suggests that epistemic consequentialism has radical consequences. /// [Robert Stalnaker] After reviewing the general ideas of the consequentialist framework, I take a critical look at two of the epistemic consequentialist projects that Philip Percival considers in his paper: the first assumes that there is a notion of acceptance that contrasts with belief and that can be evaluated by its expected epistemic utility. The second uses epis utility to evaluate beliefs and partial beliefs themselves, as well as actions, such as gathering information in the course of an inquiry. I express scepticism about the notion of acceptance required for the first project, and argue that the second kind of project can be fruitful only with a richer notion of epistemic utility than has yet been developed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sydney Shoemaker (2006). The Frege-Schlick View. In Judith Jarvis Thomson (ed.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 18-33.
John Perry (2006). Stalnaker and Indexical Belief. In Judith Jarvis Thomson & Alex Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford University Press. 204--221.
Robert Stalnaker (2007). Stalnaker on Zombies (Response to Lycan). Philosophical Studies 133 (3):481-491.
Robert Stalnaker (1986). Replies to Schiffer's "Stalnaker's Problem of Intentionality" and Field's "Stalnaker on Intentionality". Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (April):113-123.
Frank Jackson (2006). The Story of 'Fred'. In Judith Jarvis Thomson (ed.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Philip Percival (2002). Epistemic Consequentialism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):121–151.
Hartry Field (1986/2001). Stalnaker on Intentionality: On Robert Stalnaker's Inquiry. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (April):98-112.
Takashi Yagisawa, Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker, Edited by Judith Thomson and Alex Byrne. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Pp. VIII + 304. H/B £40.00. [REVIEW]
Stephen R. Schiffer (1986). Stalnaker's Problem of Intentionality: On Robert Stalnaker's Inquiry. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 67 (April):87-97.
Gerhard Nuffer (2009). Stalnaker on Mathematical Information. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):187-204.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #16,275 of 1,018,142 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,321 of 1,018,142 )
How can I increase my downloads?