David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):153-175 (2006)
One of the strongest objections to epiphenomenalism is that it precludes any kind of knowledge of qualia, since empirical knowledge has to include a causal relationship between the respective belief and the object of knowledge. It is argued that this objection works only if the causal relationship is understood in a very specific sense (as a 'direct' causal relationship). Epiphenomenalism can, however, live well with other kinds of causal relationships ('indirect' causal relationships) or even with a reliability account of knowledge which does not invoke causation at all. Michael Pauen has argued extensively (this volume of Journal of Consciousness Studies), however, that this line of defence doesn't work because it presupposes the existence of psychophysical laws connecting qualia with physical phenomena which cannot be established under epiphenomenalist presuppositions. It is argued that Pauen's arguments lead to sceptical consequences which threaten not only interactionist alternatives to epiphenomenalism but finally his own account.
|Keywords||Belief Epiphenomenalism Epistemology Functionalism Knowledge Physicalism Qualia Zombie Pauen, Michael|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dwayne Moore (2012). On Robinson's Response to the Self-Stultifying Objection. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):627-641.
Similar books and articles
Volker Gadenne (2006). In Defence of Qualia-Epiphenomenalism. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):101-114.
Neil Campbell (2003). An Inconsistency in the Knowledge Argument. Erkenntnis 58 (2):261-266.
Frank Jackson (1982). Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):127-136.
Terence E. Horgan (1987). Supervenient Qualia. Philosophical Review 96 (October):491-520.
Ausonio Marras (1993). Materialism, Functionalism, and Supervenient Qualia. Dialogue 32 (3):475-92.
William E. Seager (1983). Functionalism, Qualia and Causation. Mind 92 (April):174-88.
Michael Watkins (1989). The Knowledge Argument Against the Knowledge Argument. Analysis 49 (June):158-60.
Hans Muller (2009). More Troubles for Epiphenomenalism. Philosophia 37 (1):109-112.
Michael Pauen, Alexander Staudacher & Sven Walter (2006). Epiphenomenalism: Dead End or Way Out? Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):7-19.
Sydney Shoemaker (1975). Functionalism and Qualia. Philosophical Studies 27 (May):291-315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads69 ( #22,487 of 1,100,123 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,996 of 1,100,123 )
How can I increase my downloads?