David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kantian Review 18 (1):99-106 (2013)
In a recent paper, Desmond Hogan aims to explain how Kant could have consistently held that noumenal affection is not only compatible with noumenal ignorance (the doctrine that we have no knowledge of things in themselves) but also with the claim that experience requires causal affection of human cognitive agents by things in themselves. Hogan's argument includes the premise that human cognitive agents have empirical knowledge of one another's actions. Hogan's argument fails because the premise that we have empirical knowledge of one another's actions is ambiguous. On one reading, the argument is valid but its conclusion trivial. On the other, it is unsound on Kant's own view
|Keywords||Kant Noumenal Affection Freedom|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Desmond Hogan (2009). Noumenal Affection. Philosophical Review 118 (4):501 - 532.
Nicholas Stang (forthcoming). Who's Afraid of Double Affection? Philosophers' Imprint.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). Noumenal Causality Reconsidered: Affection, Agency, and Meaning in Kant. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (2):209 - 245.
Nicholas Stang (forthcoming). Adickes on Double Affection. In Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Congress. De Gruyter.
Claudia Jáuregui (2006). Auto-Affection and Synthesis of Reproduction. Kant-Studien 97 (3):369-381.
Nicholas F. Stang (2011). Did Kant Conflate the Necessary and the A Priori? Noûs 45 (3):443-471.
Hirotaka Nakano (2011). Selbstaffektion in der Transzendentalen Deduktion. Kant-Studien 102 (2):213-231.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). ‘Kant’s Critique of Determinism in Empirical Psychology’. In H. Robinson (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress. Marquette University Press.
Qingping Liu (2004). Is Mencius' Doctrine of 'Extending Affection' Tenable? Asian Philosophy 14 (1):79 – 90.
Theodore Di Maria (2009). Is Kant's Theoretical Doctrine of the Self Consistent with His Thesis of Noumenal Ignorance? International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1):25-40.
Yasuhiko Murakami (2010). Affection and Cogitatio. Psychopathology and Husserl's Theory of Meaning. Studia Phaenomenologica 10:193-204.
Markos Valaris (2008). Inner Sense, Self-Affection, and Temporal Consciousness in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (4):1-18.
Jennifer K. Uleman (2004). External Freedom in Kant's Rechtslehre: Political, Metaphysical. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):578–601.
Patrick Frierson (2010). Two Standpoints and the Problem of Moral Anthropology. In James Krueger & Benjamin Bruxvoort Lipscomb (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics. Walter Degruyter. 83.
Added to index2012-07-19
Total downloads119 ( #8,085 of 1,101,782 )
Recent downloads (6 months)28 ( #4,220 of 1,101,782 )
How can I increase my downloads?