David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
When it comes to how Heidegger understands theology, Martin Luther was instrumental in his early formulations. Heidegger’s interpretation of Luther leads him to descry theology as a discipline best left unfettered by metaphysics and this attitude is carried right through Heidegger’s career. By explicating Luther’s influence upon Heidegger’s early Freiburg lectures from 1919-1923, we can raise an important question about the nuanced way Heidegger construes Luther’s theology. Although the influence of Luther upon Heidegger has been well documented, what I am interested in is the difference between Luther and Heidegger’s way of relating theology to metaphysics. What I am contending is that although Luther and Heidegger share a fundamental criticism of scholastic metaphysics, they distinctly differ in their understandings of a constructive relationship between metaphysics and theology. Whereas Luther and Protestant theology continued a theologically informed metaphysics, Heidegger argues that this was a mistake which is inconsistent with the early Luther’s theology. In Heidegger’s early lectures he himself points out these nuanced interpretive issues, and it is this aspect of Heidegger’s work which I will focus on in this essay
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sean J. McGrath (2005). The Facticity of Being God-Forsaken. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):273-290.
Karl Clifton-Soderstrom (2009). The Phenomenology of Religious Humility in Heidegger's Reading of Luther. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):171-200.
Brian Gregor (2007). Formal Indication, Philosophy, and Theology: Bonhoeffer's Critique of Heidegger. Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):185-202.
James E. Faulconer & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.) (2000). Appropriating Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
Christian Lotz, McGrath, Sean. J., the Early Heidegger & Medieval Philosophy. Phenomenology for the Godforsaken, Washington: The Catholic University of America Press 2006, 268 Pages. [REVIEW]
Sean J. McGrath (2008). Alternative Confessions, Conflicting Faiths: A Review of the Influence of Augustine on Heidegger. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (2):317-335.
Matheson Russell (2011). Phenomenology and Theology: Situating Heidegger's Philosophy of Religion. Sophia 50 (4):641-655.
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2004). The Concept of Nonviolence in the Political Theology of Martin Luther King. In Roman Kozłowski Karolina M. Cern (ed.), Prawo, władza, suwerenność [Law, Power, Sovereignty]. Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Kristien Justaert (2007). “Ereignis” (Heidegger) or “La Clameur de l'Être” (Deleuze). Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):241-256.
Tyler Tritten (2012). Beyond Presence: The Late F.W.J. Schelling's Criticism of Metaphysics. De Gruyter.
Najeeb Awad (2011). Time/History, Self-Disclosure and Anticipation: Pannenberg, Heidegger and the Question of Metaphysics. Sophia 50 (1):113-133.
Stephan Käufer (2005). The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger's What is Metaphysics? Inquiry 48 (6):482 – 506.
Jethro Masís (2010). Aristóteles como protofenomenólogo: la destrucción fenomenológica heideggeriana como apropiación originaria de la conceptualidad filosófica. Princípios. Revista de Filosofía 17 (28):5-36.
Drew M. Dalton (2009). Otherwise Than Nothing. Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):105-128.
Added to index2012-02-25
Total downloads14 ( #113,718 of 1,100,986 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,065 of 1,100,986 )
How can I increase my downloads?