David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):415 – 433 (2007)
In Being and Time as well as in his later writings, Heidegger comes to distinguish between fundamental moods and everyday or inauthentic moods. He also claims that phenomenology, rather than psychology, is the appropriate method for examining moods. This article employs a schematic approach to investigate a phenomenology of fundamental moods in terms of its possibilities and limits. Since, in Being and Time, the distinction between fundamental moods and ordinary moods is tied to the division between authenticity and inauthenticity, the latter concepts need to be addressed first. Guided by Klaus Held's article 'Fundamental Moods and Heidegger's Critique of Contemporary Culture', the second part of the article argues that Heidegger's phenomenology of moods is indeed one-sided, favouring anxiety at the expense of awe. Finally, I argue that, contrary to Held's claims, this one-sidedness cannot be amended by the means one finds in Heidegger's analyses. Instead, it is necessary to undertake closer examination of those moods which necessarily involve the other person
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul E. Griffiths (1989). Folk, Functional and Neurochemical Aspects of Mood. Philosophical Psychology 2 (1):17-32.
Hubert L. Dreyfus & Sean D. Kelly, Notes on Embodiment in Homer: Reading Homer on Moods and Action in the Light of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty.
Felix Ó Murchadha (2007). Kairological Phenomenology: World, the Political and God in the Work of Klaus Held. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):395 – 413.
Hermann Weidemann (2004). Aristotle on the Reducibility of All Valid Syllogistic Moods to the Two Universal Moods of the First Figure (APrA7, 29b1–25). [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (1):73-78.
Craig Stephen Delancey (2006). Basic Moods. Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):527-538.
Laura Sizer (2006). What Feelings Can't Do. Mind and Language 21 (1):108-135.
Carolyn S. Price (2006). Affect Without Object: Moods and Objectless Emotions. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):49-68.
Laura Sizer (2000). Towards a Computational Theory of Mood. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):743-770.
Piotr Hoffman (2000). Heidegger and the Problem of Idealism. Inquiry 43 (4):403 – 411.
M. Siemer (2009). Mood Experience: Implications of a Dispositional Theory of Moods. Emotion Review 1 (3):256-263.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads56 ( #29,999 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #33,415 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?