David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 182 (3):475-492 (2011)
While epistemic justification is a central concern for both contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science, debates in contemporary epistemology about the nature of epistemic justification have not been discussed extensively by philosophers of science. As a step toward a coherent account of scientific justification that is informed by, and sheds light on, justificatory practices in the sciences, this paper examines one of these debates—the internalist-externalist debate—from the perspective of objective accounts of scientific evidence. In particular, we focus on Deborah Mayo’s error-statistical theory of evidence because it is a paradigmatically objective theory of evidence that is strongly informed by methodological practice. We contend that from the standpoint of such an objective theory of evidence, justification in science has both externalist and internalist characteristics. In reaching this conclusion, however, we find that the terms of the contemporary debate between internalists and externalists have to be redefined to be applicable to scientific contexts
|Keywords||Evidence Justification Internalism Externalism Error-statistics Security|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alvin I. Goldman (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Harvard University Press.
Philip Kitcher (1993). The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions. Oxford University Press.
Helen Longino (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press.
Alvin I. Goldman (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.
Elliott Sober (2008). Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Kent W. Staley (2012). Dirac's “Fine-Tuning Problem”: A Constructive Use of Anachronism? Perspectives on Science 20 (4):476-503.
Kent Staley (2012). Strategies for Securing Evidence Through Model Criticism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-43.
Similar books and articles
Albert Casullo (2007). What is Entitlement? Acta Analytica 22 (4):267 - 279.
Richard Otte (1990). Scientific Realism, Perceptual Beliefs, and Justification. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:393 - 404.
Mikkel Gerken (2013). Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):532-557.
Elke Brendel (1999). Coherence Theory of Knowledge: A Gradational Account. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):293-307.
Thomas Kelly (2006). The Cost of Skepticism: Who Pays? [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 131 (3):695 - 712.
Jane Duran (1988). Causal Reference and Epistemic Justification. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):272-279.
William Harper (1998). Papier Mâché Problems in Epistemology: A Defense of Strong Internalism. Synthese 116 (1):27-49.
Gregory Wheeler & Luís Moniz Pereira (2008). Methodological Naturalism and Epistemic Internalism. Synthese 163 (3):315 - 328.
Jane Duran (1994). Justification À la Mode and Justification Simpliciter. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (2):178-191.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads42 ( #79,289 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #81,086 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?