David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444 (2008)
The most interesting and perilous issue at present in comparative religious ethics is comparative ethical judgment—when and how to judge others, if at all. There are understandable historical and conceptual reasons for the current tendency to prefer descriptive over normative work in comparative religious ethics. However, judging those we study is inescapable—it can be suppressed or marginalized but not eliminated. Therefore, the real question is how to judge others (and ourselves) well, not whether to judge. Instead of bringing supposedly universal moral scoring systems to bear on reified "traditions" and "cultures," it would be better to focus on the precise details of particular practices, motifs, and theories in various settings, and compare them with an eye to substantive issues of current ethical concern
|Keywords||judgment religious ethics comparative ethics interpretation evaluation objectivity description|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Elizabeth M. Bucar (2010). The Ambiguity of Moral Excellence: A Response to Aaron Stalnaker's “Virtue as Mastery”. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):429-435.
Similar books and articles
Torkel Brekke (ed.) (2006). The Ethics of War in Asian Civilizations: A Comparative Perspective. Routledge.
David Little (1981). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Robin W. Lovin & Frank E. Reynolds (1992). Ethical Naturalism and Indigenous Cultures: Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):267 - 278.
G. Scott Davis (2008). Two Neglected Classics of Comparative Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):375-403.
John Kelsay (2010). Response to Papers for “Ethnography, Anthropology, and Comparative Religious Ethics” Focus. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):485-493.
Thomas A. Lewis, Jonathan Wyn Schofer, Aaron Stalnaker & Mark A. Berkson (2005). Anthropos and Ethics Categories of Inquiry and Procedures of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):177-185.
Jonathan Wyn Schofer (2008). Virtues and Vices of Relativism. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):709-715.
Aaron Stalnaker (2005). Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #198,532 of 1,088,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?