David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):493-504 (2013)
This paper examines the origin, range and meaning of the Principle of Action and Reaction in Kant’s mechanics. On the received view, it is a version of Newton’s Third Law. I argue that Kant meant his principle as foundation for a Leibnizian mechanics. To find a ‘Newtonian’ law of action and reaction, we must look to Kant’s ‘dynamics,’ or theory of matter. I begin, in part I, by noting marked differences between Newton’s and Kant’s laws of action and reaction. I argue that these are explainable by Kant’s allegiance to a Leibnizian mechanics. I show (in part II) that Leibniz too had a model of action and reaction, at odds with Newton’s. Then I reconstruct how Jakob Hermann and Christian Wolff received Leibniz’s model. I present (in Part III) Kant’s early law of action and reaction for mechanics. I show that he devised it so as to solve extant problems in the Hermann-Wolff account. I reconstruct Kant’s views on ‘mechanical’ action and reaction in the 1780s, and highlight strong continuities with his earlier, pre-Critical stance. I use these continuities, and Kant’s earlier engagement with post-Leibnizians, to explain the un-Newtonian features of his law of action and reaction.
|Keywords||Kant Leibniz Christian Wolff Classical mechanics Dynamical laws Interaction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Ahnert (2004). Newtonianism in Early Enlightenment Germany, C. 1720 to 1750: Metaphysics and the Critique of Dogmatic Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):471-491.
Graciela De Pierris & Michael Friedman (2008). Kant and Hume on Causality. In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1996). New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Palter (1972). Kant's Formulation of the Laws of Motion. Synthese 24 (1-2):96 - 116.
Citations of this work BETA
Marius Stan (2012). Newton and Wolff. Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):459-481.
Sheldon R. Smith (2013). Does Kant Have a Pre-Newtonian Picture of Force in the Balance Argument? An Account of How the Balance Argument Works. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):470-480.
Similar books and articles
Anja Jauernig (2008). Kant's Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but Pro Leibniz. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press 41-63.
Harold W. Brogan (2004). Kant's Retrieval of Leibniz. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):271-284.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
By Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
Benjamin Schnieder (2006). 'By Leibniz's Law': Remarks on a Fallacy. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39-54.
Marius Stan (2009). Kant's Early Theory of Motion. The Leibniz Review 19:29-61.
Antonio-Maria Nunziante & Alberto Vanzo (2009). Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):133-151.
Howard Duncan (1984). Inertia, the Communication of Motion, and Kant's Third Law of Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 51 (1):93-119.
Brandon C. Look (2011). Leibniz, Kant and Frege on the Existence Predicate. In H. Breger, J. Herbst & S. Erdner (eds.), Natur und Subjekt: Akten des IX. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses. Hartmann
Edward MacKinnon (1978). The Development of Kant's Conception of Scientific Explanation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:18 - 30.
Lucas Thorpe (2011). One Community or Many? From Logic to Juridical Law, Via Metaphysics [in Kant]. In Howard Williams, Sorin Baiasu & Sami Pihlstrom (eds.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Political Philosophy Now: University of Wales Press
Matthew C. Altman (2012). Kant and Applied Ethics: The Uses and Limits of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ohad Nachtomy (2012). Leibniz and Kant on Possibility and Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):953-972.
István Aranyosi (2010). The Nature of Shadows, From Yale to Bilkent. Philosophy 85 (332):219 - 223.
Added to index2012-11-29
Total downloads43 ( #62,129 of 1,700,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)26 ( #25,215 of 1,700,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?