David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In John Hawthorne (ed.), Language and Mind. Blackwell. 321--44 (2003)
If, relative to a context, what a sentence says is necessarily true, then what it says must be so. If, relative to a context, what a sentence says is possible, then what it says could be true. Following natural philosophical usage, it would thus seem clear that in assessing an occurrence of a sentence for possibility or necessity, one is assessing what is said by that occurrence. In this paper, I argue that natural philosophical usage misleads here. In assessing an occurrence of a sentence for possibility or necessity, one is not assessing the modal status of the proposition expressed by that occurrence of the sentence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
J. R. G. Williams (2008). The Price of Inscrutability. Noûs 42 (4):600 - 641.
Similar books and articles
George Boolos (1980). Omega-Consistency and the Diamond. Studia Logica 39 (2-3):237 - 243.
Haim Gaifman (1992). Pointers to Truth. Journal of Philosophy 89 (5):223-261.
Jordan Howard Sobel, On the Storeyed Revenge of Strengthened Liars, and the Contrary Finality of No-Proposition Resolutions.
Christopher Gauker (2006). Against Stepping Back: A Critique of Contextualist Approaches to the Semantic Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (4):393 - 422.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads136 ( #10,112 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #18,098 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?