David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 63 (3):255 (1996)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jutta Schickore (2005). 'Through Thousands of Errors We Reach the Truth'—but How? On the Epistemic Roles of Error in Scientific Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (3):539-556.
Similar books and articles
Kent W. Staley (2002). What Experiment Did We Just Do? Counterfactual Error Statistics and Uncertainties About the Reference Class. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):279-299.
Kent W. Staley (2005). Agency and Objectivity in the Search for the Top Qjjark. In P. Achinstein (ed.), Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories & Applications. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Allan Franklin (2005). The Evidence for the Top Quark: Objectivity.. Philosophy of Science 72 (4):659-661.
Kent W. Staley (2002). What Experiment Did We Just Do? Philosophy of Science 69 (2):279-99.
Peter Bokulich (2005). Review of Kent W. Staley, The Evidence for the Top Quark: Objectivity and Bias in Collaborative Experimentation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (8).
Deborah G. Mayo (1991). Novel Evidence and Severe Tests. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):523-552.
G. R. (2003). Novelty and the 1919 Eclipse Experiments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):107-129.
Tetsuji Iseda (1999). Use-Novelty, Severity, and a Systematic Neglect of Relevant Alternatives. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):413.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #223,982 of 1,088,426 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?