David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Physics 42 (5):647-655 (2012)
Robert Griffiths has recently addressed, within the framework of a ‘consistent quantum theory’ that he has developed, the issue of whether, as is often claimed, quantum mechanics entails a need for faster-than-light transfers of information over long distances. He argues that the putative proofs of this property that involve hidden variables include in their premises some essentially classical-physics-type assumptions that are not entailed by the precepts of quantum mechanics. Thus whatever is proved is not a feature of quantum mechanics, but is a property of a theory that tries to combine quantum theory with quasi-classical features that go beyond what is entailed by quantum theory itself. One cannot logically prove properties of a system by establishing, instead, properties of a system modified by adding properties alien to the original system. Hence Griffiths’ rejection of hidden-variable-based proofs is logically warranted. Griffiths mentions the existence of a certain alternative proof that does not involve hidden variables, and that uses only macroscopically described observable properties. He notes that he had examined in his book proofs of this general kind, and concluded that they provide no evidence for nonlocal influences. But he did not examine the particular proof that he cites. An examination of that particular proof by the method specified by his ‘consistent quantum theory’ shows that the cited proof is valid within that restrictive version of quantum theory. An added section responds to Griffiths’ reply, which cites general possibilities of ambiguities that might make what is to be proved ill-defined, and hence render the pertinent ‘consistent framework’ ill defined. But the vagaries that he cites do not upset the proof in question, which, both by its physical formulation and by explicit identification, specify the framework to be used. Griffiths confirms the validity of the proof insofar as that pertinent framework is used. The section also shows, in response to Griffiths’ challenge, why a putative proof of locality that he has described is flawed
|Keywords||Nonlocality Consistent quantum theory Counterfactual|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Henry P. Stapp (2011). Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer. Springer-Verlag.
Robert Griffiths (2002). Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge UP.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert B. Griffiths (2015). Consistent Quantum Measurements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52:188-197.
Robert B. Griffiths (2013). Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics is Noncontextual. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):174-181.
Similar books and articles
Henry Stapp (2006). Comments on Shimony's “An Analysis of Stapp's 'A Bell-Type Theorem Without Hidden Variables' ”. Foundations of Physics 36 (1):73-82.
Tomasz Bigaj (2007). Counterfactuals and Non-Locality of Quantum Mechanics: The Bedford–Stapp Version of the GHZ Theorem. Foundations of Science 12 (1):85-108.
Samson Abramsky (2013). Relational Hidden Variables and Non-Locality. Studia Logica 101 (2):411-452.
Robert K. Clifton, Jeremy N. Butterfield & Michael L. G. Redhead (1990). Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds--A Stapp in the Wrong Direction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):5-58.
Henry P. Stapp (1990). Comments on 'Nonlocal Influences and Possible Worlds'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (1):59-72.
Frederick M. Kronz (1990). Hidden Locality, Conspiracy and Superluminal Signals. Philosophy of Science 57 (3):420-444.
Ingemar Nordin (1979). Determinism and Locality in Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 42 (1):71 - 90.
Peter J. Lewis (2006). Conspiracy Theories of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):359-381.
Sergio Martínez (1992). ¿Qué es una ley irreductiblemente estadística? Theoria 7 (1/2/3):715-727.
Elio Conte (2012). May We Verify Non-Existing Dispersion Free Ensembles By Application of Quantum Mechanics in Experiments at Perceptive and Cognitive Level? Neuroquantology 10 (1):14-19.
Jeffrey Bub & Vandana Shiva (1978). Non-Local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:45-53.
Miklos Redei (1991). Bell's Inequalities, Relativistic Quantum Field Theory and the Problem of Hidden Variables. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):628-638.
Guillaume Adenier (ed.) (2007). Quantum Theory, Reconsideration of Foundations 4: Växjö (Sweden), 11-16 June, 2007. American Institute of Physics.
Added to index2011-05-17
Total downloads178 ( #22,677 of 1,902,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #446,006 of 1,902,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?