David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This is a brief account of a theory of presentiment/retrocausation in the context of a proposed binocular rivalry experiment. According to orthodox (classical or quantum mechanical) physics there can be no retrocausal effects. In order to accommodate such effects one must go beyond/outside orthodox theories. The simplest way to modify QM in a way that would permit such effects is to accept the hypothesis of Eccles (1987) that mental involvement (mental effort or emotion) can alter the orthodox statistical weighting factors associated with the observed outcomes of our experimental probing actions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. D. Haynes, R. Deichmann & G. Rees (2005). Eye-Specific Effects of Binocular Rivalry in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Nature 438 (7069):496-9.
Nicholas Maxwell (1976). Towards a Micro Realistic Version of Quantum Mechanics, Part II. Foundations of Physics 6 (6):661-676.
Nicholas Maxwell (1973). Alpha Partricle Emission and the Orthodox Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Physics Letters 43 (1):29-30.
Diego J. Cosmelli & Evan Thompson (2007). Mountains and Valleys: Binocular Rivalry and the Flow of Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3):623-641.
Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis (2001). Binocular Rivalry Between Complex Stimuli in Split-Brain Observers. Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.
Henry P. Stapp, Retrocausal Effects as a Consequence of Orthodox Quantum Mechanics Refined to Accommodate The Principle of Sufficient Reason.
John D. Pettigrew (2001). Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):85-118.
Frank Tong (2001). Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
R. R. Blake (2001). A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Added to index2009-05-21
Total downloads20 ( #81,851 of 1,096,804 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?