Responsible computers? A case for ascribing quasi-responsibility to computers independent of personhood or agency
Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):205-213 (2006)
| Abstract | There has been much debate whether computers can be responsible. This question is usually discussed in terms of personhood and personal characteristics, which a computer may or may not possess. If a computer fulfils the conditions required for agency or personhood, then it can be responsible; otherwise not. This paper suggests a different approach. An analysis of the concept of responsibility shows that it is a social construct of ascription which is only viable in certain social contexts and which serves particular social aims. If this is the main aspect of responsibility then the question whether computers can be responsible no longer hinges on the difficult problem of agency but on the possibly simpler question whether responsibility ascriptions to computers can fulfil social goals. The suggested solution to the question whether computers can be subjects of responsibility is the introduction of a new concept, called “quasi-responsibility” which will emphasise the social aim of responsibility ascription and which can be applied to computers | |||||||||
| Keywords | Computer Information Technology Personality Responsibility Science | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDeborah G. Johnson & Thomas M. Powers (2005). Computer Systems and Responsibility: A Normative Look at Technological Complexity. Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2).
Marie-Therese Miller (2009). Managing Responsibilities. Chelsea House.
F. Allan Hanson (2009). Beyond the Skin Bag: On the Moral Responsibility of Extended Agencies. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1).
L.�szl� Ropolyi (1999). Life-Worlds and Social Relations in Computers. AI and Society 13 (1-2):69-87.
Arthur Kuflik (1999). Computers in Control: Rational Transfer of Authority or Irresponsible Abdication of Autonomy? Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):173-184.
Bernd Carsten Stahl (2004). Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (1):67-83.
Bernd Carsten Stahl (2004). Information, Ethics, and Computers: The Problem of Autonomous Moral Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (1):67-83.
S. Grodzinsky Frances, W. Miller Keith & J. Wolf Marty (forthcoming). The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents. Ethics and Information Technology.
Frances S. Grodzinsky, Keith W. Miller & Marty J. Wolf (forthcoming). The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents. Ethics and Information Technology.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,716 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
