Sibley's "aesthetic concepts": An ontological mistake
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (3):385-389 (1971)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
E. Schellekens (2002). Aesthetic Concepts--Essays After Sibley. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (4):536-538.
Derek Matravers (2002). Review: Aesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (444):912-916.
Frank Sibley (1963). Aesthetic Concepts: A Rejoinder. Philosophical Review 72 (1):79-83.
Frank Sibley (1959). Aesthetic Concepts. Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.
H. R. G. Schwyzer (1963). Sibley's "Aesthetic Concepts". Philosophical Review 72 (1):72-78.
Emily Brady & Jerrold Levinson (eds.) (2001). Aesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley. Oxford University Press.
George Dickie (2004). Reading Sibley. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):408-412.
Anna Bergqvist (2010). Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Frank Sibley (2001). Approach to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Malcolm Budd (2006). The Characterization of Aesthetic Qualities by Essential Metaphors and Quasi-Metaphors. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):133-143.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads18 ( #67,622 of 549,638 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,638 )How can I increase my downloads? |

