David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 49 (2):237-259 (2010)
In this discussion, we ponder the discourse about the ‘body of the Divine’ in the Indian tradition. Beginning with the Vedas, we survey the major eras and thinkers of that tradition, considering various notions of the Supreme Divine Being it produced. For each, we ask: is the Divine embodied? If so, then in what way? What is the nature of the body of the Divine, and what is its relationship to human bodies? What is the value of the body of the Divine to the spiritual aspirant? We consider, where relevant, which views are pantheistic and which might be considered panentheistic. Panentheism is connected with discourse on the world as the body of God. It has origins in medieval Christian theology with anticipatory traces in Plato’s Timeaus. Under pantheism, were the world to end—were it to collapse or disappear irreversibly, perhaps, into a huge black hole—then God would disintegrate without a remainder as well; for in this view the Divine Spirit is the universe. The same is not true under panentheism which posits a more complex relationship between the Divine and the world. According to panentheism, God pervades the world—God is in the world—and at the same time, God sustains the world—the world is in God. This allows that God be greater than, transcendent of and independent of the world. In our conclusion we remark on how the views we have surveyed link to, resonate with, or dis-compare with the current—should one say revivified—interest in intellectual quarters with panentheism
|Keywords||Panentheism Brahman India – Religion God (Hinduism) Pantheism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Raphael Lataster (2014). The Attractiveness of Panentheism—a Reply to Benedikt Paul Göcke. Sophia 53 (3):389-395.
Similar books and articles
Susan Peppers-Bates (2008). Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer (2010). Remythologizing Theology: Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship. Cambridge University Press.
Steven D. Crain (1997). Divine Action in a World Chaos. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):41-61.
Ted Peters (2007). Models of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288.
Daniel P. Wisniewski (2009). Love in the "Unidiverse": A Salesian Perspective on Chance. Zygon 44 (3):583-600.
Brain T. Trainor (2010). The Divine Undergirding Of Human Knowing. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):205-234.
Avi Kujman (2010). John Milton: A Dialogical Discourse on God, Satan and Humanity: The Humanization of God Through Negativity and the Possible Human Condition. Create Space.
Arjan Markus (2004). Divine Timelessness: A Coherent but Unfruitful Doctrine? Sophia 43 (2):29-48.
Carol P. Christ (2003). She Who Changes: Re-Imagining the Divine in the World. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2010-07-03
Total downloads14 ( #311,950 of 1,902,847 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #324,370 of 1,902,847 )
How can I increase my downloads?