David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):339-360 (2002)
P. Kyle Stanford - The Manifest Connection: Causation, Meaning, and David Hume - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40:3 Journal of the History of Philosophy 40.3 339-360 The Manifest Connection: Causation, Meaning, and David Hume P. Kyle Stanford 1. Introduction exciting recent hume scholarship has challenged the traditional view that Hume's theory of meaning leads him to deny the very intelligibility or coherence of supposing that there are objective causal powers or intrinsic necessary connections between causally related entities. Influential recent interpretations have variously held that Hume himself accepted the existence of such powers and connections, that he was genuinely agnostic about them, or that he denied their existence while nonetheless holding it to be a perfectly coherent possibility, indeed one that we routinely think actual. In this paper I will argue against all three of these lines of interpretation and in favor of what I consider a neglected alternative: that Hume rejects the existence of objective necessary connections or causal powers as literally incoherent or meaningless, but on subtle and sophisticated semantic grounds, rather than simplistic ones. I find support for this semantic reading and against the alternatives not only in passages whose significance to the debate is widely appreciated, but also in Hume's discussions "Of Liberty and Necessity" and "Of the Immateriality of the Soul." The..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Walter Ott (2009). What Can Causal Claims Mean? Philosophia 37 (3):459-470.
Asher Jiang (2015). Hume on the Meaning of ‘Power. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 13 (3):229-248.
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Schaffer (2001). Causation, Influence, and Effluence. Analysis 61 (1):11–19.
David Francis Pears (1990). Hume's System: An Examination of the First Book of His Treatise. Oxford University Press.
Graciela De Pierris (2002). Causation as a Philosophical Relation in Hume. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (3):499 - 545.
Maria Pia Paganelli, Endogenous Money and David Hume. Eastern Economic Journal.
Pierfrancesco Basile (2007). Whitehead, Hume and the Phenomenology of Causation. In Subjectivity, Process, and Rationality (Process Thought, Volume 14). Heusenstamm Bei Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag
David Owens (1992). Causes and Coincidences. Cambridge University Press.
Galen Strawson (1989). The Secret Connexion: Causation, Realism, and David Hume. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan Schaffer (2000). Causation by Disconnection. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):285-300.
Helen Beebee (2006). Hume on Causation. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #103,772 of 1,725,153 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,933 of 1,725,153 )
How can I increase my downloads?