David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1):65-82 (1997)
The Rationality of Valuing Oneself: A Critique of Kant on Self-Respect CYNTHIA A. STARK IN RECENT DECADES several philosophers have examined the notion of self- respect and illustrated its moral importance. Thomas E. Hill Jr., for instance, argues that the failure to properly value one's moral rights, which is exhibited by such characters as the Deferential Wife and the Uncle Tom, is a violation of a duty to oneself.' Robin Dillon shows the connection between self-respect and moral goods such as integrity, autonomy, and responsibility. She chronicles the suffering and diminishment of character experienced by those who lack self-respect, such as the Self-Doubter, the Slavishly Dependent, the Vaguely Self-Defining, the Complacent, and the Shameless, to name only a few? And John Rawls tells us that self-respect is the most important primary social good; it is something that any rational agent would want, regardless of the content of her conception of the good.3 In spite of the effort to illustrate the significance of self-respect and its place in moral theory, very littleattention has been given in contemporary views to justifying the idea that self-respect is an important moral good.4 This omission is remarkable, given that self-respect is often appealed to as a means of justifying various other philosophical claims or views. For example, Bernard Boxill argues that the disempowered ought to protest their subordination because this is a means of publicly..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anita M. Superson (2005). Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests. Hypatia 20 (4):109-126.
Anita Superson (2010). The Deferential Wife Revisited: Agency and Moral Responsibility. Hypatia 25 (2):253 - 275.
Anita Superson (2005). Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests. Hypatia 20 (4):109-126.
Similar books and articles
Lara Denis (1997). Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):321–348.
Anja Jauernig (2008). Kant's Critique of the Leibnizian Philosophy : Contra the Leibnizians, but Pro Leibniz. In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press 41-63.
Robin S. Dillon (2007). Arrogance, Self-Respect and Personhood. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):101-126.
Melissa Zinkin (2006). Respect for the Law and the Use of Dynamical Terms in Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):31-53.
Clark Zumbach (1981). Kant's Argument for the Autonomy of Biology. Nature and System 3:67 - 79.
Mark Timmons (ed.) (2002). Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpetative Essays. Oxford University Press.
Nancy A. Stanlick (2002). Hobbesian Friendship: Valuing Others for Oneself. Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (3):345–359.
Lara Denis (2002). Kant's Ethical Duties and Their Feminist Implications. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 28 (Supplement):157-87.
Robert Sharp (2012). The Dangers of Euthanasia and Dementia: How Kantian Thinking Might Be Used to Support Non-Voluntary Euthanasia in Cases of Extreme Dementia. Bioethics 26 (5):231-235.
Neil Roughley (2002). The Uses of Hierarchy: Autonomy and Valuing. Philosophical Explorations 5 (3):167 – 185.
Jane Singleton (2007). Kant's Account of Respect: A Bridge Between Rationality and Anthropology. Kantian Review 12 (1):40-60.
Owen Ware (2010). Kant, Skepticism, and Moral Sensibility. Dissertation, University of Toronto
Thomas Kelly (2003). Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
Immanuel Kant (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2012-08-28
Total downloads16 ( #239,842 of 1,934,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #196,346 of 1,934,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?