The road to "Experience and Prediction" from within: Hans Reichenbach's scientific correspondence from Berlin to Istanbul
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 181 (1):137 - 155 (2011)
Ever since the first meeting of the proponents of the emerging Logical Empiricism in 1923, there existed philosophical differences as well as personal rivalries between the groups in Berlin and Vienna, headed by Hans Reichenbach and Moritz Schlick, respectively. Early theoretical tensions between Schlick and Reichenbach were caused by Reichenbach's (neo) Kantian roots (esp. his version of the relativized a priori), who himself regarded the Vienna Circle as a sort of anti-realist "positivist school"—as he described it in his Experience and Prediction (1938). One result of this divergence was Schlick's preference of Carnap over Reichenbach for a position at the University of Vienna (in 1926), and his decision not to serve as a co-editor with Reichenbach for the journal Erkenntnis that they jointly established in 1930 (which was then co-edited by Carnap and Reichenbach from 1930 to 1938). A second split rooted in different views on induction and probability, which culminated in the Hans Reichenbach's refusal to serve as an invited author on probability within the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science series ed. by Rudolf Carnap, Charles Morris and Otto Neurath from 1938 onwards. In this regard it is remarkable that also Richard von Mises, who was the second leading figure of Logical Empiricism in Turkish exile, criticized the theory of probability put forward by his former Berlin colleague. In this paper I analyse this controversial exchange, drawing on the relevant correspondence and asking whether these (meta) philosophical differences were a typical feature of the pluralism inherent in Logical Empiricism in general
|Keywords||Logical Empiricism Vienna Circle Berlin Group Probability Theory Hans Reichenbach Experience and Prediction|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Herbert Feigl (1934). The Logical Character of the Principle of Induction. Philosophy of Science 1 (1):20-29.
Clark Glymour, Hans Reichenbach. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Rainer Hegselmann & Geo Siegwart (1991). Zur Geschichte der 'Erkenntnis'. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):461 - 471.
Don Howard (2006). Lost Wanderers in the Forest of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Discovery-Justification Distinction. In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer. 3--22.
Hans Reichenbach (1935). Über Induktion und Wahrfcheinlichkeit. Erkenntnis 5 (1):267-284.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elliott Sober (2011). Reichenbach's Cubical Universe and the Problem of the External World. Synthese 181 (1):3 - 21.
W. H. Werkmeister (1938). Book Review:Logical Positivism, Pragmatism, and Scientific Empiricism. Charles W. Morris; Experience and Prediction. Hans Reichenbach; The Degrees of Knowledge. Jacques Maritain, Bernard Wall. [REVIEW] Ethics 48 (4):549-.
Frederick Eberhardt (2011). Reliability Via Synthetic a Priori: Reichenbach's Doctoral Thesis on Probability. Synthese 181 (1):125 - 136.
Nicolas Rescher (2006). The Berlin School of Logical Empiricism and its Legacy. Erkenntnis 64 (3):281 - 304.
Wenceslao J. González (1995). Reichenbach's Concept of Prediction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):37-58.
Wenceslao J. González (1995). Reichenbach's Concept of Prediction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):37 – 58.
Maria Carla Galavotti (2011). On Hans Reichenbach's Inductivism. Synthese 181 (1):95 - 111.
Gürol Irzık (2011). Hans Reichenbach in Istanbul. Synthese 181 (1):157 - 180.
Added to index2009-08-03
Total downloads15 ( #90,306 of 1,088,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?