Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):143-164 (1989)
|Abstract||Abstract Psychology's goal has been to become a science, taking the modern natural sciences as the model. It has not been understood that each science undergoes a transition from early disunification to later unification, that a fundmental dimension is involved that differentiates sciences. Psychology is a modern disunified science, distinguished by its chaotic knowledge and ways of operating. A philosophy of science based on modem unified science, as philosophies generally are, is inappropriate as a means of understanding psychology or of guiding its development. We need a philosophy to describe the special problems of theory construction of modern disunified sciences, and to advance paths by which to work on those problems. Theory tasks to be undertaken in large quantities range from articles to reduce artificial diversity to the construction of grand unified theory. Psychology must begin those tasks, and it must understand its characteristics as a modern disunified science, if it is to make good decisions concerning its development and organization. Otherwise it will continue on its path towards fragmentation, an impenetrable obstacle to full development as a science and a profession|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Arthur W. Staats (1986). Unified Positivism: A Philosophy for Psychology and the Disunified Sciences. Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):77-90.
Peter Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) (1996). The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Stanford University Press.
Steve Clarke (2007). Against the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22.
Howard Rachlin (1994). Behavior and Mind: The Roots of Modern Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Brian L. Keeley (2000). Shocking Lessons From Electric Fish: The Theory and Practice of Multiple Realization. Philosophy Of Science 67 (3):444-465.
Barry Gholson (ed.) (1989). Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge University Press.
Gary Hatfield (1994). Philosophy of Psychology as Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:19 - 23.
Jakob Hohwy (2003). Capacities, Explanation and the Possibility of Disunity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (2):179 – 190.
Tony Neville (1977). The Challenge of Modern Thought. University Tutorial Press.
William E. Lyons (1992). Intentionality and Modern Philosophical Psychology, III--The Appeal to Teleology. Philosophical Psychology 5 (3):309-326.
Ulrich Fiedeler (2011). When Does the Co-Evolution of Technology and Science Overturn Into Technoscience? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):83-101.
Arthur W. Staats (1983). Psychology's Crisis of Disunity: Philosophy and Method for a Unified Science. Praeger.
Nicholas Maxwell (2013). Has Science Established That the Cosmos is Physically Comprehensible? In A. Travena & B. Soen (eds.), Recent Advances in Cosmology. Nova Science Publishers.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?