Why do mathematicians need different ways of presenting mathematical objects? The case of cayley graphs
Topoi 29 (1) (2010)
|Abstract||This paper investigates the role of pictures in mathematics in the particular case of Cayley graphs—the graphic representations of groups. I shall argue that their principal function in that theory—to provide insight into the abstract structure of groups—is performed employing their visual aspect. I suggest that the application of a visual graph theory in the purely non-visual theory of groups resulted in a new effective approach in which pictures have an essential role. Cayley graphs were initially developed as exact mathematical constructions. Therefore, they are legitimate components of the theory (combinatorial and geometric group theory) and the pictures of Cayley graphs are a part of practical mathematical procedures.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert W. Burch (1994). Game-Theoretical Semantics for Peirce's Existential Graphs. Synthese 99 (3):361 - 375.
B. Courcelle (2012). Graph Structure and Monadic Second-Order Logic: A Language-Theoretic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
J. C. E. Dekker (1981). Twilight Graphs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):539-571.
Michael Kohlhase & Andrea Kohlhase, Spreadsheet Interaction with Frames: Exploring a Mathematical Practice.
Karlis Podnieks & John Tabak, The Nature of Mathematics – an Interview with Professor Karlis Podnieks.
Jeffrey J. Kline & Shravan Luckraz, A Note on the Relationship Between Graphs and Information Protocols.
Jessica Carter (2004). Ontology and Mathematical Practice. Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3):244-267.
Added to index2010-01-23
Total downloads72 ( #11,623 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?