Autonomy and tradition: a critique of the sociological and philosophical foundations of giddens's utopian realism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):34-51 (2004)
This article examines the theoretical background to Giddens?s programme of ?utopian realism?. It begins by looking at the way in which Giddens defines this programme in the context of social welfare. We then turn to a more detailed discussion of the theoretical presuppositions of ?utopian realism?, focusing first on Giddens?s reworking of Durkheimian autonomy, and second, on his reclamation of the conservative idea of tradition as propounded by Michael Oakeshott. The critical focus of my argument rests on the philosophical claims Giddens makes for the sociology of morals. In this respect, I find his diagnosis of the discontents of modernity no less wanting than his proposed solution
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hanna Fenichel Pitkin (1976). Inhuman Conduct and Unpolitical Theory: Michael Oakeshott's on Human Conduct. Political Theory 4 (3):301-320.
John C. Rees (1953). Professor Oakeshott on Political Education. Mind 62 (245):68-74.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher G. A. Bryant (1992). Sociology Without Philosophy? The Case of Giddens's Structuration Theory. Sociological Theory 10 (2):137-149.
Nigel Pleasants (1997). The Epistemological Argument Against Socialism: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Hayek and Giddens. Inquiry 40 (1):23 – 45.
Anthony King (2000). The Accidental Derogation of the Lay Actor: A Critique of Giddens's Concept of Structure. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):362-383.
Anthony Giddens (1995). A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Stanford University Press.
Nick Hostettler (2007). Did Ludwig Wittgenstein Really_ Understand Roy Bhaskar? Review of _Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar by Nigel Pleasants. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 3 (1).
Nigel Pleasants (1999). Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas, and Bhaskar. Routledge.
Paul Wetherly (2004). On The Global Third Way Debate, Edited by Anthony Giddens, Anthony Giddens's Where Now for New Labour?, and Alex Callinicos's Against the Third Way. Historical Materialism 12 (1):181-196.
Kenneth H. Tucker (1993). Aesthetics, Play, and Cultural Memory: Giddens and Habermas on the Postmodern Challenge. Sociological Theory 11 (2):194-211.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #461,412 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,527 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?