David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theology and Science 7 (3):261-274 (2009)
Mathematics is obviously important in the sciences. And so it is likely to be equally important in any effort that aims to understand God in a scientifically significant way or that aims to clarify the relations between science and theology. The degree to which God has any perfection is absolutely infinite. We use contemporary mathematics to precisely define that absolute infinity. For any perfection, we use transfinite recursion to define an endlessly ascending series of degrees of that perfection. That series rises to an absolutely infinite degree of that perfection. God has that absolutely infinite degree. We focus on the perfections of knowledge, power, and benevolence. Our model of divine infinity thus builds a bridge between mathematics and theology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) (2011). Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Brian Clegg (2003). Infinity: The Quest to Think the Unthinkable. Distributed by Publishers Group West.
Steven M. Rosen (1983). The Concept of the Infinite and the Crisis in Modern Physics. Speculations in Science and Technology 6 (4):413-425.
R. T. Mullins (2016). Divine Perfection and Creation. Heythrop Journal 57 (1):122-134.
Eli Maor (1987/1991). To Infinity and Beyond: A Cultural History of the Infinite. Princeton University Press.
Edward Nelson (2011). Part II. Perspectives on Infinity From Mathematics : 2. The Mathematical Infinity / Enrico Bombieri ; 3. Warning Signs of a Possible Collapse of Contemporary Mathematics. [REVIEW] In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press
Wolfgang Achtner (2005). Infinity in Science and Religion. The Creative Role of Thinking About Infinity. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 47 (4):392-411.
Anne Newstead (2007). Review of Oppy's Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):679-695.
Carl Posy (2008). Intuition and Infinity: A Kantian Theme with Echoes in the Foundations of Mathematics. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83 (63):165-193.
Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2011). On the Infinite in Mereology with Plural Quantification. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):54-62.
Steven B. Cowan (1996). A Reductio Ad Absurdum of Divine Temporality. Religious Studies 32 (3):371 - 378.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2011). Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists). In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave
Added to index2010-10-31
Total downloads34 ( #112,717 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #122,579 of 1,789,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?