David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 77 (5):1058-1069 (2010)
In order to make scientific results relevant to practical decision making, it is often necessary to transfer a result obtained in one set of circumstances—an animal model, a computer simulation, an economic experiment—to another that may differ in relevant respects—for example, to humans, the global climate, or an auction. Such inferences, which we can call extrapolations, are a type of argument by analogy. This essay sketches a new approach to analogical inference that utilizes chain graphs, which resemble directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) except in allowing that nodes may be connected by lines as well as arrows. This chain graph approach generalizes the account of extrapolation I provided in my (2008) book and leads to new insights that integrate the contributions of the other participants of this symposium. More specifically, this approach explicates the role of “fingerprints,” or distinctive markers, as a strategy for avoiding an underdetermination problem having to do with spurious analogies. Moreover, it shows how the extrapolator’s circle, one of the central challenges for extrapolation highlighted in my book, is closely tied to distinctive markers and the Markov condition as it applies to chain graphs. Finally, the approach suggests additional ways in which investigations of a model can provide information about a target that are illustrated by examples concerning nanomaterials in sunscreens and Wendy Parker’s discussion of fingerprints in climate science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Federica Russo (2011). Correlational Data, Causal Hypotheses, and Validity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):85 - 107.
Francesco Guala (2014). The Role of Experiments in Economics: Reply to Jones. Economics and Philosophy 30 (3):503-511.
Federica Russo (2010). Comparative Process Tracing: Yet Another Virtue of Mechanisms? Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (1):81-87.
Lara Huber & Lara K. Keuck (2013). Mutant Mice: Experimental Organisms as Materialised Models in Biomedicine. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):385-391.
Similar books and articles
Miklos Ajtai & Ronald Fagin (1990). Reachability is Harder for Directed Than for Undirected Finite Graphs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1):113-150.
Priti Shah & Eric G. Freedman (2011). Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Processes. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3):560-578.
Julie David & Marilyn Prosch (2010). Extending the Value Chain to Incorporate Privacy by Design Principles. Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):295-318.
J. C. E. Dekker (1981). Twilight Graphs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):539-571.
Jiji Zhang & Peter Spirtes, A Transformational Characterization of Markov Equivalence for Directed Maximal Ancestral Graphs.
Irina Starikova (2010). Why Do Mathematicians Need Different Ways of Presenting Mathematical Objects? The Case of Cayley Graphs. Topoi 29 (1):41-51.
Peter Turney (1989). The Architecture of Complexity: A New Blueprint. Synthese 79 (3):515 - 542.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #47,715 of 1,725,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #33,738 of 1,725,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?