David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):321-330 (2000)
This paper is a response to Christopher Boorse's recent defense of hisBiostatistical Theory (BST) of health and disease. Boorse maintains that hisconcept of theoretical health and disease reflects the ``consideredusage of pathologists.'' I argue that pathologists do not use ``disease'' inthe purely theoretical way that is required by the BST. Pathology does notdraw a sharp distinction between theoretical and practical aspects ofmedicine. Pathology does not even need a theoretical concept of disease. Itsfocus is not theoretical, but practical; pathology's goal is to contribute tothe healing of patients. Pathology, even experimental pathology, is notvalue-free. Not only ``disease'' but also such terms as ``nerve'' and ``organ''are laden with conceptual values.
|Keywords||disease health pathology philosophy of medicine values|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Boorse (2014). A Second Rebuttal On Health. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (6):683-724.
Richard P. Hamilton (2010). The Concept of Health: Beyond Normativism and Naturalism. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):323-329.
Marco Antonio Azevedo (2015). Health as a Clinic-Epidemiological Concept. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21 (3):365-373.
J. David Guerrero (2010). On a Naturalist Theory of Health: A Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 41 (3):272-278.
Similar books and articles
Scott DeVito (2000). On the Value-Neutrality of the Concepts of Health and Disease: Unto the Breach Again. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):539 – 567.
Peter Hucklenbroich (1984). System and Disease: On the Fundamental Problem of Theoretical Pathology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (3).
Juha Räikkä (1996). The Social Concept of Disease. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).
Thomas Schramme (2007). The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Randolph M. Nesse (2001). On the Difficulty of Defining Disease: A Darwinian Perspective. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):37-46.
Elselijn Kingma (2010). Paracetamol, Poison, and Polio: Why Boorse's Account of Function Fails to Distinguish Health and Disease. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):241-264.
Germund Hesslow (1993). Do We Need a Concept of Disease? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1).
Christopher Boorse (1977). Health as a Theoretical Concept. Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
George J. Agich (1983). Disease and Value: A Rejection of the Value-Neutrality Thesis. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (1).
Sara Moghaddam-Taaheri (2011). Understanding Pathology in the Context of Physiological Mechanisms: The Practicality of a Broken-Normal View. Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):603-611.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads64 ( #66,980 of 1,907,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #45,449 of 1,907,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?