Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481 (1983)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093870449
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
John P. Burgess (1981). Relevance: A Fallacy? Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104.
John P. Burgess (1984). Read on Relevance: A Rejoinder. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223.
John P. Burgess (1983). Common Sense and ``Relevance''. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):41-53.
Matti Eklund (2012). Truth. [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):106-108.
Julia Tanner (2006). The Naturalistic Fallacy. Richmond Journal of Philosophy 13.
Joel Marks (1988). When is a Fallacy Not a Fallacy? Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):307-312.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #470,405 of 1,926,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #453,420 of 1,926,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.