Book review: The scandal of pleasure: Art in an age of fundamentalism
Philosophy and Literature 20 (1) (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWendy Steiner (1995). The Scandal of Pleasure: Art in an Age of Fundamentalism. University of Chicago Press.
James E. Tomberlin (1994). Whither Southern Fundamentalism? Philosophical Issues 5.
Gaius Glenn Atkins (1932). Book Review:History of Fundamentalism. Stewart G. Cole. [REVIEW] Ethics 42 (3):374-.
Arthur Schafer (2007). Commentary: Science Scandal or Ethics Scandal? Olivieri Redux. Bioethics 21 (2):111–115.
Aaron Smuts (2007). The Paradox of Painful Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 41 (3):59-77.
Tomáš Hříbek (2011). Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. Estetika 48 (2):248-253.
Irwin Goldstein (2003). Malicious Pleasure Evaluated: Is Pleasure an Unconditional Good? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.
Hermann Keyserling (1937). The Art of Life. London, Selwyn & Blount.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,637 of 550,273 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,273 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
