Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):247-254 (2003)
|Abstract||The debate and implementation of Clinical Ethics Consultation (CEC) is still in its beginnings in Europe and the issue of the patient's perspective has been neglected so far, especially at the theoretical and methodological level. At the practical level, recommendations about the involvement of the patient or his/her relatives are missing, reflecting the general lack of quality and practice standards in CEC. Balance of perspectives is a challenge in any interpersonal consultation, which has led to great efforts to develop technical approaches, e.g., in psychological counseling or psychotherapeutic treatment. In ethics, unbalance or partiality is a matter of justice and has provoked significant theoretical work, also relevant for practical medical ethics. A lack of balance seems to be particularly serious in those situations, where ethical conflict is triggering a consultation and where the parties involved may try to persuade the consultant that their particular opinion is the most convincing; but to our knowledge the connection between patient/relatives involvement and balance has not yet been discussed in the context of CEC. Central questions of access and involvement of the patient and his/her relatives will be analysed and discussed regarding the challenge of balance and the adequate role or attitude of a Clinical Ethics Consultant. It is argued that the Clinical Ethics Consultant should have a methodological awareness regarding the concepts of neutrality versus advocacy in his/her role and try to achieve a balanced procedure that allows for an optimum of change of perspectives. The argumentation is developed along the narrative of a real case study. Recommendations concerning the involvement of (the perspectives of) the patient or the relatives are formulated for the practice of CEC|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lisa M. Rasmussen (2012). Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (2011). Responsibility After the Apparent End: 'Following-Up' in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Bioethics 25 (7):413-424.
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Alfred Simon (2009). Quality Standards for Clinical Ethics Consultation. Diametros 22:105 – 115.
Mark J. Bliton & Stuart G. Finder (1999). Strange, but Not Stranger: The Peculiar Visage of Philosophy in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Human Studies 22 (1):69-97.
Laurie Zoloth-Dorfman & Susan B. Rubin (1997). Navigators and Captains: Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (4).
Florian Bruns & Andreas Frewer (2011). Ethics Consultation and Empathy. HEC Forum 23 (4):247-255.
Barry Hoffmaster (1999). Anatomy of a Clinical Ethics Consultation. Human Studies 22 (1):53-68.
Marion Danis (ed.) (2012). Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook. Oxford University Press.
Gerd Richter (2007). Greater Patient, Family and Surrogate Involvement in Clinical Ethics Consultation: The Model of Clinical Ethics Liaison Service as a Measure for Preventive Ethics. HEC Forum 19 (4).
Joel E. Frader (1992). Political and Interpersonal Aspects of Ethics Consultation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (1).
Rouven Porz, Elleke Landeweer & Guy Widdershoven (2011). Theory and Practice of Clinical Ethics Support Services: Narrative and Hermeneutical Perspectives. Bioethics 25 (7):354-360.
Joy D. Skeel & Donnie J. Self (1989). An Analysis of Ethics Consultation in the Clinical Setting. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (4).
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads2 ( #232,684 of 549,715 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?